The Supreme Court held that there is a community caretaking exception to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement because police perform “community caretaking functions, totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute."
False. There are numerous SCOTUS cases in which they very clearly outline how the ZOGbots are neither there to uphold the law nor to protect and serve.
>The Supreme Court held that there is a community caretaking exception to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement because police perform “community caretaking functions, totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute."
False. There are numerous SCOTUS cases in which they very clearly outline how the ZOGbots are neither there to uphold the law nor to protect and serve.
What are some cases to read on it?
What are some cases to read on it?
I'll see if I have them saved but I don't think I do.
It's common knowledge so...
No. I just have the (((ruling))) from a few years ago where... whatever you read it, cops can't be held to the law or expected to know the law;
I'll see if I have them saved but I don't think I do.
It's common knowledge so...
No. I just have the (((ruling))) from a few years ago where... whatever you read it, cops can't be held to the law or expected to know the law;
https://archive.fo/o3zjS
Agreed.
Agreed.
(post is archived)