Bingo. The decision was already made, a long time ago. Any attempt to convince the people that a decision is being made on this issue today is clearly anhistorical and a case of anti-constitutional social engineering. But, then again, what's new? This decision doesn't matter. We knew that Communist sympathizing, Jew-sympathizing politicians and their militant enforcement groups were going to come for guns eventually - whether it's on the back of *this* premise or *that* premise hardly matters. The only decisions that will matter are going to be the millions that take place in the minds of home, property, and firearm owners across the country when the boots come to kick in their doors. A favorable decision at the level of SC could be a useful stopgap, temporarily. But we ought not to think that these powers depend totally upon the SC, and let's not forget that the SC effectively turned their backs on the interests of the people in this most recent election debacle, ruling that a state or group of states had no legal standing in a case against the integrity of state-level elections frauds (despite the clear implication that fraud in any state's election system disrupts the legal and political parity for every single fucking state).