Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

Scary case coming before them. Some might think that with the new semi-conservative justices, they'd side with gun rights, but those rino cuckservitives almost always side with giving the police more power.

Scary case coming before them. Some might think that with the new semi-conservative justices, they'd side with gun rights, but those rino cuckservitives almost always side with giving the police more power.

(post is archived)

[–] • 14 pts

7 of the 9 are roman catholics. They serve only one master. (and it isnt us)

[–] • 5 pts

If you look at their voting history, that master seems to be government abuse.

[–] • 1 pt

The fruits of their master.

[–] • 1 pt

Do you dislike Catholics irl, or just Catholicism?

[–] • 0 pt

You’re a 🍌

[–] • 0 pt

I'm calling /thread here, friends. OP has left no further room for discussion.

[–] • 0 pt

??

[–] • 11 pts

The Supreme Court held that there is a community caretaking exception to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement because police perform “community caretaking functions, totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute."

False. There are numerous SCOTUS cases in which they very clearly outline how the ZOGbots are neither there to uphold the law nor to protect and serve.

[–] • 1 pt

What are some cases to read on it?

[–] • 3 pts

I'll see if I have them saved but I don't think I do.

It's common knowledge so...

No. I just have the (((ruling))) from a few years ago where... whatever you read it, cops can't be held to the law or expected to know the law;

https://archive.fo/o3zjS

[–] • 10 pts

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

[–] • 11 pts

Yeah, but they infringe on it regularly. I want burst fire and full auto anonymous mail order like before I was born.

[–] • 9 pts

If the people will not defend their rights, why would they respect them?

[–] • 4 pts

We didn't and they wouldn't, unfortunately.

[–] • 5 pts

I want a mail-order bride, equipped with a mail-order AK47

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

They age terribly and will divorce your sorry ass if you don't have money or prestige.

Imagine thinking women are worthwhile investments of your time and effort in 2021... The jewish rats have had 2000 years on top of women's already inherently degenerate nature to turn them into little more than seductress nigger-jew monstrosities unfit and undeserving of utopian civilization.

[–] • 0 pt

Hahaha! That sounds awesome!

[–] • 1 pt

Do you want niggers, arabs, and taco niggers to have burst fire and full auto by mail? I don't. They aren't even Americans.

Now that said I agree that those laws are bullshit, full out, and once the non-Whites are purged from the country, they should be abolished. Stuff like that only works in a high trust society.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

Why are niggers, arabs and taco niggers here and why do they have legal protection?

It's all part of the same scam.

[–] • 0 pt

Do you want niggers, arabs, and taco niggers to have burst fire and full auto by mail?

No. But therein lies a problem. Some of the recent gun-tyranny laws were put in place so that the lesser sub-species of human couldn't gain access to them. However, there is absolutely no political will to only allow this service to real humans (Europeans, Asians, some fraction White middle easterners and White north africans).

If they take them away from them, they're also taking them away from us.

Besides, most niggers get cheap guns and don't practice- that takes a capacity to look into the future, which they don't have.

[–] [deleted] • -2 pt

once the non-Whites are purged from the country

What are you smoking? There is no "purge" - you are deluded and genocidal.

[–] • 4 pts

The implied second part is that it's up to us to keep government in check. We created it, it's our responsibility. The very entity overstepping its bounds can't be expected to enforce them.

[–] • 7 pts

I take offense to the very notion that they think even considering this nonsense will be tolerated.

If it has come to them openly considering this, then it has gone on long enough.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Bingo. The decision was already made, a long time ago. Any attempt to convince the people that a decision is being made on this issue today is clearly anhistorical and a case of anti-constitutional social engineering. But, then again, what's new? This decision doesn't matter. We knew that Communist sympathizing, Jew-sympathizing politicians and their militant enforcement groups were going to come for guns eventually - whether it's on the back of this premise or that premise hardly matters. The only decisions that will matter are going to be the millions that take place in the minds of home, property, and firearm owners across the country when the boots come to kick in their doors.

A favorable decision at the level of SC could be a useful stopgap, temporarily. But we ought not to think that these powers depend totally upon the SC, and let's not forget that the SC effectively turned their backs on the interests of the people in this most recent election debacle, ruling that a state or group of states had no legal standing in a case against the integrity of state-level elections frauds (despite the clear implication that fraud in any state's election system disrupts the legal and political parity for every single fucking state).

[–] • 7 pts

muh rino

Don't. Republicans by default are anti-gun. Stop trying to force the lie that they're pro-gun.

[–] • 0 pt

That's exactly my point.

[–] • 1 pt

Don't use the label 'rino' at all. It gives credence to the idea the "muh true republican ..."

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

and also gives tacit support for the establishment. R isn't much better than D.

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

I'm sure the SC will rule in favor of the police helping the communists setup a gun grab.

Snivel War is coming!

[–] • 2 pts

I'm sure the SC will rule in favor of the police helping the communists setup a gun grab.

Yeah, that's what I fear too.

[–] • -1 pt

I hate to say this, but you might be right about a second civil war. I think that what the left, liberal rats want so they put under a,totalitarian government just like Germany in the 30's and 40's. If in this war, half of us get killed, the less people they will have to control.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

That was Hitler, Weimar was more like 20s.

[–] • 5 pts

Mr. Caniglia was arguing with his wife and melodramatically put an unloaded gun on the table and said “shoot me now and get it over with.” His wife called a non-emergency number for the police who arrived shortly thereafter.

There it is.

"My husband, who was sick of my nagging bullshit, told me to shoot him. Send other men with guns to back me up so I can win the argument. What? No, he didn't threaten me at all, he implied he'd rather me kill him than listen to my nagging anymore. Send armed men anyway."

If your wife calls the cops on you, she's not your wife anymore.

[–] • 4 pts

So a wife cannot be forced to testify against her husband, but if she wants to then the husband has no recourse?

Islam is right about women.

[–] • 0 pt

Your recourse is to get rid of her and tell her exactly why.

She went outside of your marriage to gather a force of other men and use their power against her husband.

Now she can ask one of those other men to marry her, because you have no use for a bitch who will use state enforcers against you.

[–] • 1 pt

>If your wife calls the cops on you, she's not your wife anymore.

That's the fucking truth.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Don't tell your wife anything.

"She's not your wife anymore" is very common.

Don't tell your kids anything either.

A relatively quick death isn't looking so bad anymore.

[–] • 2 pts

Really disagree with that. My wife is awesome. I tell her everything that's burdening my heart.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

:) Now americans can finally back up ALL THAT TALK

[–] • 2 pts

I've been hoping that we're not all talk for a long time. But one vigilante does not a Republic save, we need a million people. Without that it's useless.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It would be nice to see 50 million stand up on one day and shut down the country like niggers and say ENOUGH. It would be awesome to get a synchronized chant going on through the entire country. If everyone picked one day to 'protest', something could happen. Even 10 million. I don't think 1 million would be enough. We would need to be in communication with people on other continents to make sure our news got out of north america. I wouldn't put it past them to shut down the internet if something like this was ever planned.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

"Protests" are not how this works.

You're going to need to wrap your heads around it.

[–] • 1 pt

1 million is 4x as large as our standing army. For sure it would be enough.

[+] [deleted] • 3 pts
[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

They can die without a warrant.

[–] • 1 pt

I'd never claim that that outcome was obviously a good one which would strongly reduce the number of other tyrants harming people and/or infringing on their rights.... BUT I think that would be a positive outcome in minecraft.

[–] • 3 pts

That is straight up tyranny. No candy coating at all.

[–] • 0 pt

Well if they rule incorrectly, yes.

Load more (24 replies)