WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K
Have at it.. Nothing really new. https://web.archive.org/web/20210126111158/https://michaeljlindell.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ANTHOLOGY-OF-HAMMER-AND-SCORECARD-ARTICLES-PUBLISHED-BY-THE-AMERICAN-REPORT.pdf

(post is archived)

[–] 16 pts

Evidence is pointless when the courts are compromised.

[–] 0 pt

no justice in the courts means justice in the streets.

[–] -8 pt

I just skimmed it, but I didn't see any "smoking gun" evidence. Lots of circumstantial though.

[–] 9 pts

lmfao

"skimmed it"

"didn't see anything relevant"

that's probably why you don't skim things kike anon, and you definately don't post how you purposefully don't read things then talk about them as if they are "deboonked" lmfao

people like you make me laugh, soooooooooo stupid.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

Careful now. The left has convinced America that you need concrete eyewitness proof with video and it must be all caught live to convict them of any wrongdoing however the left will convict you over a puff piece article written in the NYT by an activist hack writer with info from some anonymous source that may or may not exist. There is no rule of law in America. All you need do is analyze both impeachments. Trump was impeached for something that Biden did and we have concrete evidence right now Joe committed quid pro quo. The current impeachment is a complete joke. More evidence of Maxine Waters inciting violence against the American people than of Trump inciting violence.

[–] 1 pt

We have that.

[–] -1 pt

The current impeachment is a complete joke.

Absolutely. Now where's the smoking gun about the election being stolen? The fact that the left does X does not discharge the need for strong evidence for a serious allegation.

[–] 0 pt

?

[–] 0 pt

https://www.deepcapture.com Read this, but if you skim it you'll get nothing out of it.

A "smoking gun" isn't needed. Enough smells like a skunk to high heaven to have an actual investigation, but that's not good enough for you

[–] 0 pt

How do you "skim" a video? Watch 30 seconds then skip ahead 10 minutes and repeat until the video is over?

How would this process assist in your comprehension of what is in the video?

[–] 0 pt

I skimmed the article.

To skim a video first skip the introduction, then skip ahead every few seconds until they get to the important bit, then watch that. Total recollection of the whole video isn't possible (unless you have a special memory) or necessary.

[+] [deleted] 9 pts
[–] 3 pts

The information on hammer scorecard alone in this report nullifies the election.

[–] 1 pt

In non-clown world. Thats not where we live.

[–] 3 pts

Pillow Boy apparently hasn't figured out that the US government supports the fraud.

[–] 0 pt

Of course they do. Even if they did care (which they don't as it got them into office) they can't even hint that there is any veracity to the claims. If the plebs even catch a whiff that their "vote" doesn't matter they'd be looking at revolution.

That's why you have all these news readers droning with the same script that there's no evidence, it's all lies and dangerous information. Yeah it's dangerous. Dangerous if the common man learns the truth.

[–] 1 pt

copy paste before it is gone: youtube-dl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKaSX9SKR1A&feature=emb_logo

Get youtube-dl here: https://youtube-dl.org/ I am enjoying listening and viewing the video. Got the youtube link here: https://michaeljlindell.com/ OP's link leads to a 404.

[–] 0 pt

gone already!

upload the mp4 to catbox if it is under 250mb

[–] 0 pt

I found this document to be highly enlightening, especially due to the poor quality of sites pretending to debunk it: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be36dc6d-0df4-4c20-addf-fca72be46150/The Navarro Report Volume III Final 1.13.21-0001.pdf

downloaded from https://navarroreport.com/

[–] 0 pt

404

[–] 0 pt

It still works for me. Did you copy paste including the spaces?

[–] 0 pt

Why is Poal handling a pdf link like an image?

[–] 0 pt

Another excellent, and long, analysis is by Overstock founder Patrick Byrne. https://www.deepcapture.com

Apparently, Rudy Giulliani steered the "stop the steal" counter attack towards the courts based on procedural arguments (State's unconstitutional methods) which was a losing strategy as we found out too late.

Patrick Byrne, MIke Flynn and Syndey Powell wanted to take a different tactic towards exposing the actual fraud, but Giulliani ran out the clock in the bottom of a whiskey bottle.

[–] 0 pt

Page not available at 3:35pm 2-5-21

rules much less evidence don't matter in our banana republic.

Load more (4 replies)