You think they couldn't beat his dead man's switch out of him once they had him in the desert somewhere officially dead?
I've seen the argument a bunch of times over on voat, I've just never seen a good reason presented for it. Keeping him alive meant only risks and costs. Taking his information then taking over his operation after he was dead meant only profit.
You think they couldn't beat his dead man's switch out of him once they had him in the desert somewhere officially dead?
I've seen the argument a bunch of times over on voat, I've just never seen a good reason presented for it. Keeping him alive meant only risks and costs. Taking his information then taking over his operation after he was dead meant only profit.
You think they couldn't beat his dead man's switch out of him
I know they couldn't. That's how dead man's switches work.
Just fuck off. You're LITERALLY jewposting with a completely jew-controlled mind.
WTC also "could have" been done by Al-Qaeda.
Nazi Germany also "could have" shoahed 6 million jews.
The civil war "could have" been about slaves.
> You think they couldn't beat his dead man's switch out of him
I know they couldn't. That's how dead man's switches work.
Just fuck off. You're LITERALLY jewposting with a completely jew-controlled mind.
WTC also "could have" been done by Al-Qaeda.
Nazi Germany also "could have" shoahed 6 million jews.
The civil war "could have" been about slaves.
Have a nice day <3
Have a nice day <3
(post is archived)