WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I can accept the possibility that he was kept alive and exfiltrated. Once they had extracted all his blackmail details though, I can't see any reason why they'd keep him alive.

[–] 1 pt

Really dude? It was posted hundreds of times on voat and you're from voat.

You were kike-controlled there too.

You honestly think the guy with dirt on nearly EVERY world power didn't have a dead-man's switch?

You're nigger-tier retarded.

[–] 2 pts

You think they couldn't beat his dead man's switch out of him once they had him in the desert somewhere officially dead?

I've seen the argument a bunch of times over on voat, I've just never seen a good reason presented for it. Keeping him alive meant only risks and costs. Taking his information then taking over his operation after he was dead meant only profit.

[–] 1 pt

You think they couldn't beat his dead man's switch out of him

I know they couldn't. That's how dead man's switches work.

Just fuck off. You're LITERALLY jewposting with a completely jew-controlled mind.

WTC also "could have" been done by Al-Qaeda.

Nazi Germany also "could have" shoahed 6 million jews.

The civil war "could have" been about slaves.