WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

786

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts

we need to make all drugs legal since we can't enforce it but all guns should be banned to stop people from doing illegal things with them

Fuck off liberal faggots.

[–] 2 pts

we need to make all drugs legal since we can't enforce it and because it being illegal causes more crime and other harm. Guns should also be legal. and no one here said otherwise.

[–] 1 pt
  • They're right about drugs. Guns are a different issue.

This is like how bank of america does budgeting. Flood an inexperienced manager with a ton of cash (usually millions), see them fail, and THEN proclaim they need more training to be a better manager.

[–] -2 pt

No. The right way to deal with drugs is to simply execute the addicted. I know you're falling over yourself looking for another reason to spend someone else's money on a made up problem because you're a true leftist faggot piece of shit, but you're wrong about this. Probably because you're a low functioning pot head alcoholic yourself and the only way you can survive is on someone else's dime.

[–] 1 pt

I know you're falling over yourself looking for another reason to spend someone else's money

Not the point.

because you're a true leftist faggot piece of shit, but you're wrong about this.

Sorry to burst your bubble. Libertarian here. I prefer guns in society, less welfare, and less government.

The right way to deal with drugs is to simply execute the addicted.

But then again, perhaps antifa sees something that I've been missing.

[–] 1 pt

I think Oregon has unrestrictive gun laws.

[–] 1 pt

If that was true then Andy Ngo wouldn't have left town in fear of his life from weakling Antifa faggots.

[–] 0 pt

Oh yeah, I think they did enact a "mental health" gun ceasing law. Ooops.

[–] 9 pts

Great news

[–] 4 pts

It’s how it should be. Look what Portugal did.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, that was key in changing my mind on drug decrim. A long time ago, I bought the logic that legalized drugs would just mean everyone would be a heroin junky and crime would skyrocket. But I had friends that got into hard drugs, and I had the opportunity but never did any- it certainly wasn't from fear of punishment, I'm just not retarded.

[–] 1 pt

Likewise. I’ve done blow before, but none of the other stuff.

[–] 4 pts

One of the few things I agree with libs on. Where we don't agree is shooting someone that's robbing you to get money for drugs. I'm pro!

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

the drug addicts dont want treatment

[–] 0 pt
[–] [deleted] 2 pts

i dont have time to listen to the gates foundation rnow

[–] 1 pt

lol, fucking heroine addicts always defend each other. It's some kind of sick, perverse rationalization of deviant behavior. You're essentially a gay pride fag but you penetrate yourself with AIDS infected needles instead of AIDS infected dicks.

Either way you deserve death.

[–] 0 pt

Decriminalization is NOT legalization. If you traffic drugs, you're still going to face jail. If you want the drug abuse to decrease and to decrease the demand, you don't persecute users. If you're CIA and need that sweet drug money, then keep making life harder for drug users by sending them to jail.

[–] 4 pts

Decriminalize BUT DO NOT assist. They use, the quit, or the don't. THEIR CHOICE. THEIR RESPONSIBILITY. THEIR CONSEQUENCE. PERIOD. You DO NOT punish the PRUDENT for the SINS of the EVIL (and/or stupid)

[–] 0 pt

as long as I'm allowed to shoot the meth / crack addicts they break into my shed and try to steal my tools.

[–] 0 pt

Of course. THEY must learn the REALITIES of THEIR choices. They are NOT getting that this way. Some NEED to be "shot" (Will NEVER get it). Some will be USED, some will WISE UP and just STOP (I did) because it's a FALSE path that DOES NOT lead to ENLIGHTENMENT other than (FALSE PATH...of EVIL (brings it out in you)).

[–] 0 pt

Decrase the cost of drugs and they'll be less likely to break in. Decrease the drug use and again they'll be less likely to break in.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

I'm for this. Drugs should be cheaply sold in the supermarket like sugarcandies. This would take care of crime, because there'd be no more money in the drugtrade.

Besides, some people are able to handle drugs without problems, and some aren't. I know lots of alcoholics, who are able to keep a family and don't crash, but they need their bottle of wine in the evening, or else they'll crash. I don't mind about this. The same is true with other drugs.

IMHO those who can't handle drugs have bad genes and should die off. Luckily drugs help them to die off, and we should let nature take it's course. All this rehab and drug-criminalization is in the way of nature, and btw leads to tyranny.

[–] 1 pt

Take away the profit motive and there's less motive for drug dealers to get more people hooked.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

That's achieved by making drugs dirt cheap and accessible. But let's be honest here, drug-dealers aren't bad people. Some people can take drugs, and others can't. Some people can function well while using opioids, others become wholly dysfunctional as soon as they get some weed. That's not the fault of some nigger trying to make some honest money in retail.

[–] 3 pts

In this thread, a bunch of CIA niggers pretending like drugs are cool.

[–] 1 pt

Or liberty minded people who are against the government outlawing plants and jailing people for non-violent offenses.

[–] 4 pts

Decriminalizing drugs decreases a whole range of side controls. The justification of financial surveillance is because you might be using your money to facilitate drugs. A lot of unconstitutional searches are over drugs. How much money has been lost to civil forfeiture and asset seizure are due to drug laws? If drugs were decriminalized we would be a much freer society. Even if you don't want to use drugs but you value privacy and freedom, you should be against drug laws.

[–] 2 pts

I agree with you in principle, but I am still going to socially ostracize and mock anyone who advocates drug use of any kind.

[–] 0 pt

Like the CIA WANTS to cut its supply of alternative funding. I call BS. If anything, the CIA will be opposing these measures because it DECREASES drug use. Clearly, the comments opposing this move are the glowing ones.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

So OR makes one giant step towards a synthetic hellscape, merely to pander to the self-entitled bitching of worthless, garbage human beings.

[–] 1 pt

Prepare for even more frequent flier s for the ER

[–] 1 pt

The article is extremely biased.

Load more (13 replies)