This is the only righteous stance.
Taking peoples' money in exchange for shit you don't own, because you expect it to lose value before you have to pay for it and give it to the person who paid you, is one of the scummiest things I've ever heard of in business.
This is the only righteous stance.
Taking peoples' money in exchange for shit you don't own, because you expect it to lose value before you have to pay for it and give it to the person who paid you, is one of the scummiest things I've ever heard of in business.
Most likely invented by the same guy who (((founded))) mmf. It's a step farther than mortgages, where the home "owner" owns the debt, the utilities, the insurance, and all the obligations, whilst the bank charges you interest for your house, when they themselves have close to zero liability (at least in today's world, why charge interest, if Uncle Jerome will print what you need for cover?)
Most likely invented by the same guy who (((founded))) mmf. It's a step farther than mortgages, where the home "owner" owns the debt, the utilities, the insurance, and all the obligations, whilst the bank charges you interest for your house, when they themselves have close to zero liability (at least in today's world, why charge interest, if Uncle Jerome will print what you need for cover?)
(post is archived)