Well the article says it is in the Court Documents. So if the reporters can pull those court documents, so can the public with access to those same court documents.
But do you trust the courts?
The same courts that refused to allowed any evidence to be presented in 80+ cases of mass election fraud.
It will give us more to go on than just that tweet.
Evidence from known liars is no evidence at all.
And if you make the mistake of trusting anything that comes out of a u.s. court then you're setting yourself up to be fooled.
Federal courts have about as much integrity, credibility, and legitimacy as the FBI.
Which is to say they have exactly none.
You can pull them pretty easily, you need to know the court and the case in question.
But lying about the statements of judges and lawyers is a bad idea even for the fake news.
Also the "cases" he helped on are really non-cases, low level drug stuff. He, being a dumb nigger, may have unwittingly given information that lead to busts.
(post is archived)