If the gov't paid for the vaccine then it should all be public already

Me, yesterday, had my normal 6 month checkup with my VA Doctor. Phone consult, because can't see me in person, covid bs. She says, paraphrasing here "would you like to come in for a flu shot?" Me:"no thank you, the flu shot usually makes me sick, I only want to be up to date on my tetanus shot because I work on old rusty cars." Doctor says "Well this year is different, normally they put a dead bug in the vaccine, which MAY have made you sick previously, but THIS YEAR, there is no dead bug in there, they have replaced it with a protein. Did you know this year there has been hardly any flu at all? Because of the flu shots, we have eradicated the flu for this year."

I didn't know my Doctor was retarded. Honestly didn't know. Instead of me saying "you brain dead bitch, the reason their is no flu is because all flu has been renamed to covid." I politely declined her poison, and told her to check my tetanus status, I'm due for my 10 year booster shot next year.

I bet it makes the frogs gay.

So the original links to the drop seem to be dead. I found the original forums where it was posted, but not the original thread. I did find another thread with a release of older data from a few years ago, and a backup link to the drop.

Thread located atl

https://raidforums.com/Thread-CSV-Pfizer-Medical-Customers-Orders-Leaks

File is located at:

https://anonfiles.com/31yace9bpb/-rGv_zip

Edit:

Reading through some emails and the rolling update document from the end of November, the interesting information I've found:

(As of November) Regulatory approval is being sought to market and deliver vaccines. Main issue appears to be in mid-Nov was that commercial (aka delivered) products had down to 50% fragmented species of mRNA present. The goal is 70% to ensure the vaccine is potent enough to work. It appears this issue may have been fixed within a few weeks.

Further, the rolling update document "Quality rolling review CHMP overview and list of questions" for the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BioNTech, 30 November 2020, states on page 21 that "...the potential safety risks associated with truncated RNA isoforms are not addressed." This is in relation to discussing impurities in vaccines. From this section:

Process-related and product-related impurities as well as potential contaminants are described in this section. Five batches were evaluated for impurities, i.e. clinical, initial emergency supply and PPQ batches. It is noted that this section is incomplete and will be updated after PPQ completion. The sole product-related impurity addressed is double-stranded RNA, derived from the in-vitro transcription reaction. Results from the five DS batches demonstrate that the level of double stranded RNA is low, acceptable and consistent. In addition to double stranded RNA, there are more product-related impurities, i.e. truncated RNA, also referred to as fragmented species. Truncated RNA is reflected in the DS specification in terms of RNA integrity. However, the characterisation of BNT162b2 DS is currently not found acceptable in relation to the CQA RNA integrity. Significant differences between batches manufactured by Process 1 and 2 are observed for this specific attribute. Even though two methods, namely agarose gel electrophoresis and capillary gel electrophoresis, have been applied to determine RNA integrity of BNT162b2 DS, no characterisation data on RNA integrity and truncated forms is presented and the potential safety risks associated with truncated RNA isoforms are not addressed. This is especially important considering that the current DS and DP acceptance criteria allows for up to 50% fragmented species. Therefore, the dossier should be updated with additional characterisation data and discussion on mRNA integrity, this is considered a major objection.

In simpler terms, the RNA is doing things in the vaccine vials, to include: 1.Spontaneous combination into double-stranded RNA 2.Degradation into shorter-strand RNA molecules

From this November document, it appears safety concerns for number 2 above have not been sufficiently investigated (again, as of November). The lack of safety information for these truncated RNA fragments constitutes a major objection.

I wanna have some idea about what these "vaccines" actually do, because there is no disease to be cured, and the vaccines are not vaccines in a traditional sense, but apparently some mRNA technology that modifies the DNA of the patient.

I always wonder why they have to withhold the raw-data files from public.

What's so hard about releasing an excel file with everything, we don't need them to break it down into graphs for us, we can do that ourselves.

So where on the internet is the data...

Limited hangout operation.