It would be great if they totally tanked but I think they'll be fine. Too valuable an asset for the glowniggers to fail.
It would be great if they totally tanked but I think they'll be fine. Too valuable an asset for the glowniggers to fail.
The Chinese Communist Party conquered America very easily. Nobody who supports Empress Kamaltoe and Poor Old Sloppy Joe even realized it either.
Welcome to the Brave New World.
The Chinese Communist Party conquered America very easily. Nobody who supports Empress Kamaltoe and Poor Old Sloppy Joe even realized it either.
Welcome to the Brave New World.
Twitter fucked up, they damaged their business model. Companies go on Twitter to build their brand and engage with their customers. They pay Twitter for this, via ads, to get engagement and gain followers. Twitter sent two messages to business with the Trump ban
Even if you're the President of the United States, we will ban your account and invalidate every penny you've ever invested into the platform if we don't like you
You can spend money and time gaining followers, but if we don't like their politics we'll ban them and invalidate every penny you've invested in engaging and gaining that user as a follower.
Twitter went from being a safe marketing investment that is growing users to an unsafe one where your audience can be banned for something that has nothing to do with your business. And FYI, that's their business model, it's how they primarily make money. Jack has completely lost sight of the purpose of Twitter. It's to let normal people talk to provide an audience to advertisers, it's not a political movement.
Jack has no way to fix this, he either backs out of all his bans and tells business they made a mistake and Twitter is safe to advertise on. Either he loses business or he loses a large portion of the audience. A president that's supposedly going to be gone forever after January 20th is a very odd hill for Twitter to die on.
Twitter fucked up, they damaged their business model. Companies go on Twitter to build their brand and engage with their customers. They pay Twitter for this, via ads, to get engagement and gain followers. Twitter sent two messages to business with the Trump ban
1. Even if you're the President of the United States, we will ban your account and invalidate every penny you've ever invested into the platform if we don't like you
2. You can spend money and time gaining followers, but if we don't like their politics we'll ban them and invalidate every penny you've invested in engaging and gaining that user as a follower.
Twitter went from being a safe marketing investment that is growing users to an unsafe one where your audience can be banned for something that has nothing to do with your business. And FYI, that's their business model, it's how they primarily make money. Jack has completely lost sight of the purpose of Twitter. It's to let normal people talk to provide an audience to advertisers, it's not a political movement.
Jack has no way to fix this, he either backs out of all his bans and tells business they made a mistake and Twitter is safe to advertise on. Either he loses business or he loses a large portion of the audience. A president that's supposedly going to be gone forever after January 20th is a very odd hill for Twitter to die on.
The real thing that should be plummeting is Amazon. Imagine wanting to host with that for their 99.999% uptime when you can get shut down at any time when you can have 99.99% uptime for 70% of the cost and no political threats.
Everyone should be ditching Amazon immediately, and advising their employers to do so. These dumb asses and parler are saying they can't operate without Amazon. If you have only a 99.99% uptime that leaves a 0.01% chance of business failure over it in the worst case scenario. If that's the options you have then you do it. Even youtube has gone down and they don't haven't been kicked out of the market for it.
The tiniest margins in percent uptime are a false economy. Most tech people chase it because they want to cover their asses in case something does happen and their boss says, why didn't we go with the one with the tiniest fraction more up time. This helps Amazon sell their services way over valued.
Parler's downtime really should be counted in the uptime stats if we are being honest. Doesn't sound like perfect uptime to me. So their uptime stats are a lie anyway.
In terms of scale, there is always a way to scale using multiple services. You'll even find that some of them have advantages like almost free storage, or cheap ram, or cheap processing. With some effort you can run nearly for free. It just takes (a lot) of market research. You can beat Amazon's bang for buck by entire folds. Then you can afford to use redundancy to make up for that uptime (something you need anyway because of your own errors), and bam, you have something better than Amazon, saved yourself almost all the money, aren't giving money to Amazon, or granting them a monopoly, or exposing yourself to being the next target of the tech cabal.
It's completely advisable to ditch Amazon.
The real thing that should be plummeting is Amazon. Imagine wanting to host with that for their 99.999% uptime when you can get shut down at any time when you can have 99.99% uptime for 70% of the cost and no political threats.
Everyone should be ditching Amazon immediately, and advising their employers to do so. These dumb asses and parler are saying they can't operate without Amazon. If you have only a 99.99% uptime that leaves a 0.01% chance of business failure over it in the worst case scenario. If that's the options you have then you do it. Even youtube has gone down and they don't haven't been kicked out of the market for it.
The tiniest margins in percent uptime are a false economy. Most tech people chase it because they want to cover their asses in case something does happen and their boss says, why didn't we go with the one with the tiniest fraction more up time. This helps Amazon sell their services way over valued.
Parler's downtime really should be counted in the uptime stats if we are being honest. Doesn't sound like perfect uptime to me. So their uptime stats are a lie anyway.
In terms of scale, there is always a way to scale using multiple services. You'll even find that some of them have advantages like almost free storage, or cheap ram, or cheap processing. With some effort you can run nearly for free. It just takes (a lot) of market research. You can beat Amazon's bang for buck by entire folds. Then you can afford to use redundancy to make up for that uptime (something you need anyway because of your own errors), and bam, you have something better than Amazon, saved yourself almost all the money, aren't giving money to Amazon, or granting them a monopoly, or exposing yourself to being the next target of the tech cabal.
It's completely advisable to ditch Amazon.
Twitter, facebook, instagram etc. are cancer. I hope they die.
Twitter, facebook, instagram etc. are cancer. I hope they die.
the irony here is amazing.
i literally had an argument on here this week with a guy telling him that it is unethical to short businesses because its effectively wishing them ill fortune. and here i am TODAY shorting twitter because im am actively wishing them ill fortune.
oh the chuckles are real
the irony here is amazing.
i literally had an argument on here this week with a guy telling him that it is unethical to short businesses because its effectively wishing them ill fortune. and here i am TODAY shorting twitter because im am actively wishing them ill fortune.
oh the chuckles are real
Let it fall, it would not bother me at all.
Let it fall, it would not bother me at all.
next week they'll rise 20%...
next week they'll rise 20%...
what will the commies do when there is no one to taunt?
what will the commies do when there is no one to taunt?
LOL. I'm looking at the prices now as I type this. The fall is 8.31%. Ha-ha-ha. Idiots.
LOL. I'm looking at the prices now as I type this. The fall is 8.31%. Ha-ha-ha. Idiots.
(post is archived)