Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

576

A few examples:

Cloudflare (startpage.com). Warrant canary explanation (techdirt.com)

AWS (startpage.com).

Azure (startpage.com).

Apple (startpage.com).

Amazon (startpage.com).

Twitter (startpage.com).

Facebook (startpage.com).

Youtube (startpage.com).

A few examples: [Cloudflare](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="cloudflare"+"deplatform"). [Warrant canary explanation](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20191220/23475043616/cloudflare-removes-warrant-canary-thoughtful-post-says-it-can-no-longer-say-it-hasnt-removed-site-due-to-political-pressure.shtml) [AWS](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="AWS"+"deplatform"). [Azure](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="azure"+"deplatform"). [Apple](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="apple"+"deplatform"). [Amazon](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="amazon"+"deplatform"). [Twitter](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="twitter"+"deplatform"). [Facebook](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="facebook"+"deplatform"). [Youtube](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="youtube"+"deplatform").

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (42).
[–] • 0 pt

Sorry bakers, you're not allowed to kick out your customers.

Supreme court says you are. Do you expect even one person to follow the "bakers can't deny gay customers" line of reasoning into where you want them to go? This argument sucks so hard it's a shitpost.

[–] • 0 pt

True. But the lawsuit should have been thrown out at lower court. I'd go as far as saying the lower courts should never have heard the case. It was tyranny.