WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

A few examples:

Cloudflare (startpage.com). Warrant canary explanation (techdirt.com)

AWS (startpage.com).

Azure (startpage.com).

Apple (startpage.com).

Amazon (startpage.com).

Twitter (startpage.com).

Facebook (startpage.com).

Youtube (startpage.com).

A few examples: [Cloudflare](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="cloudflare"+"deplatform"). [Warrant canary explanation](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20191220/23475043616/cloudflare-removes-warrant-canary-thoughtful-post-says-it-can-no-longer-say-it-hasnt-removed-site-due-to-political-pressure.shtml) [AWS](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="AWS"+"deplatform"). [Azure](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="azure"+"deplatform"). [Apple](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="apple"+"deplatform"). [Amazon](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="amazon"+"deplatform"). [Twitter](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="twitter"+"deplatform"). [Facebook](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="facebook"+"deplatform"). [Youtube](https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query="youtube"+"deplatform").

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 7 pts (edited )

I always questioned the wisdom of hosting so much critical infrastructure not only off-site, but also handing it directly to an entity that says "Trust us"

The huge biz didnt chase cloud onto the table to help grandmas wordpress blog become an industry. They did it to get that sweet sweet data.

[–] 3 pts

You can host it yourself, but they'll just go directly to ICANN to get you kicked off the internet completely.

[–] 0 pt

You can host it yourself, but they'll just go directly to ICANN

Why don't we just start our own registrar. Shit, gab started its own comment section for the internet.

[–] 0 pt

Isn't there only one registrar? Why don't we just start our own internet? Oh, they won't let us build the infrastructure or launch satellites? Let's get our own planet then! Problem solved.

[–] 0 pt

Isn't there only one registrar?

no, but most of them are probably acting as an ideological cartel, same as many other sectors.

[–] 0 pt

You're probably the south african superman if I had to guess.

Understand part of what makes industry possible is the wealth of free oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen in our atmosphere. Steel production? Requires water and oxygen in massive quantities. Manufacturing? Yep. Chemical industry? And on and on and on.

On a planet without an atmosphere, the entrepreneurs operating in such an environment, now have to factor in that cost. And because of how the supply/demand problem is best solved by many competing actors, thats gonna make it more difficult. The same people running the main enterprise, providing all the infrastructure to live there, are also gonna have to effectively be the government. And what that means is they'll be competing with themselves, which means, no matter HOW good they think they are, ultimately that comes down to ego, and ego is no substitute for market forces.

Probably building on a new planet is gonna require the governing authority to effectively offer charters to various subcompanies, keeping competition, limiting monopolization, and basically keeping the on-site economy running at max development/growth rate. And that will be necessary because once anything remotely viable is established, governments or enterprises enabled by governments, will seek to take over or leverage the existing authorities out of their position.

More broadly theres probably gonna have to be some sort of minimum commons, "the right to breathe" for example simply as a safety net against using essentials we take for granted on earth, as a political leverage tool.

Also, expect economic attacks, infiltration of said chartered companies to intentionally mismanage key sectors in order to breed popular dissatisfaction. Ideological subversion. Etc.

A mars position also makes a claim on the asteroid belt plausible.

Personally if I ran mars or the moon, once established, I'd slow walk helping earth gov build out its own space infratructure, and then knock a meteor into earth to collapse world economies and government. From there you can come in as the savior, and establish control from the old powers.

It'd be a two-fer. All the old governments are abominations anyway.

[+] [deleted] 3 pts
[–] 2 pts

It has probably been part of the play all along to gain control over business's not already compromised. They will have hella leverage anytime they want to, whenever they want to. Just plant a spy in the company, say/do stupid shit, post on social media, threaten to deplatform if you don't do X (that could be so many things). It takes years to move a big company to the cloud - two days to move is criminal.

I bet every IT person is double checking those terms they signed now :)

[–] 2 pts

Oh well sense we have a trust together, we are going to do everything humanly possible to unperson you goy. We were not successful at deprogramming conservatives, In fact our tactics just enraged them. So we will just rage quit the party for you.

[–] 2 pts

Cloud is a dumb idea for anything other than backups. You are paying a subscription that won't end and giving them easy access to your company's data. They reserve the right to give you the boot at any moment for just about any reason, cutting you off from your data.

Alternatively, they can wreck your business by increasing the subscription. Office 365 was cheap as hell, then a year or two ago they started increasing the prices.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

work at a big globohomo that is in the process of moving a bunch of data and servers to amazon and ms, going to lol if they do a shut it down in a few years for us not sufficiently donating to dead-jogger gold coffin funds or something.

[–] 0 pt

Wait until you have to attend "unconscious bias" training. Basically, (((they))) want to disable you by requiring you second guess every thing you do.

[–] 1 pt

AWS is absolute dogshit. Who gave these morons license to do business?

[–] 0 pt

and you are a dumb socialist baboon who think a business needs a license. Besides AWS is awesome in many ways

[–] 2 pts (edited )

In the area I work in(socialists don't work, or believe in earning their way), AWS is utter trash, it's ability to analyze data is pathetic, it's obviously coded by diversity hires and pajeets. We designed our own proprietary software, with in house designed models and have 6% better data analysis accuracy with 10% of the resources they use. FUCK AWS and fuck Amazon.

Jew owned software and hardware is stagnating like rotting pond water. You hire and promote the wrong kind of people, and you are reaping the seeds you sown.

[–] 1 pt

They buy dominant companies and then use their position to absorb and prey on smaller companies until they own it all. The product never improves past that point. That's why there are always so many UI changes, to give the appearance of progress.

[–] 1 pt

People shouldn't be mixing their politics with their business regardless of which side they're on

Fuck aws for removing services it disagrees with. Fuck people who post autist levels of red pills and wonder why people get pissed at them

Just stfu and let everyone work in a neutral environment

[–] 0 pt

What I find amusing is when open source projects start virtue signaling. Refactoring code to remove "master/slave" terminology.

[–] 0 pt

You'r wrong. Bakers are allowed to kick out customers.

[–] 0 pt

Perhaps bakers can refuse to do business with people they don't agree with, but they get sued and lose (startpage.com) by activist courts if they try.

[–] 0 pt

You also can sue Big Cloud platforms. As far as I can tell the baker did not lose in the end.

[–] 1 pt

It's true that they (no idea why it's always baking shops) don't lose, but that's not the point. The purpose is to eventually destroy them through court and lawyer fees, there are infinite activists with infinite amounts of money to waste. They hate anyone not toeing the line.

IIRC, there was another baker in some other part in the country facing the same kind of persecution from the nearby college who was bankrolling their students to endlessly sue him into bankruptcy.

[–] 0 pt

He lost because his business was ruined and he had to spend a lot of resources defending himself against an attack.

[–] 0 pt

Sorry bakers, you're not allowed to kick out your customers.

Supreme court says you are. Do you expect even one person to follow the "bakers can't deny gay customers" line of reasoning into where you want them to go? This argument sucks so hard it's a shitpost.

[–] 0 pt

True. But the lawsuit should have been thrown out at lower court. I'd go as far as saying the lower courts should never have heard the case. It was tyranny.

Load more (2 replies)