The 230 repeal proposed by Mitch McConnel included a change to definition of "interactive computer service" to include the software creators. Basically the attack on 230 is going to go after the creators of distributed systems such that they're also liable for 3rd party content posed with their software.
So, as long as the lunatics' are in charge, there's no hiding.
The 230 repeal proposed by Mitch McConnel included a change to definition of "interactive computer service" to include the software creators. Basically the attack on 230 is going to go after the creators of distributed systems such that they're also liable for 3rd party content posed with their software.
So, as long as the lunatics' are in charge, there's no hiding.
I didn't follow the 230 saga as closely as I should have. McConnel's stipulation didn't sneak through, did it? Like tacked on to some other reg that passed?
I didn't follow the 230 saga as closely as I should have. McConnel's stipulation didn't sneak through, did it? Like tacked on to some other reg that passed?
(post is archived)