"equality" is the simplest and most apparent of conceptual truths.
(((equality))) is ultra-complex because it uses every avenue possible to attain what it wants as the conclusion ["excuse" masquerading in form of logical argument]
incomprehensible
because it is a falsehood (how can one understand something that is false?--like 2+2=5 [oh, you don't "get" how it is 5?, that is proof that you are ignorant [not to mention unfairly, personally, bias against me--why else would you deny/disagree with (((my))) discovery?] )
"equality" is the simplest and most apparent of conceptual truths.
(((equality))) is ultra-complex because it uses every avenue possible to attain what it wants as the conclusion ["excuse" masquerading in form of logical argument]
>incomprehensible
because it is a falsehood (how can one understand something that is false?--like 2+2=5 [oh, you don't "get" how it is 5?, that is *proof* that you are ignorant [not to mention unfairly, personally, bias against me--why else would you deny/disagree with (((my))) discovery?] )
(post is archived)