I've read an article lately about the tests, which sums up quite effectively how those PCR tests can find anything and everything in anybody ultimately This one https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives >>The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. **The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.** ... >>Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying: >>with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.” >>And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said: >>If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.” ... I think the situation regarding tests, with just that bit, is pretty clear It's a clusterfuck >>Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus. **Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.** Now here is the interesting bit >>So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+. Hmmmmmmm....