i wouldn't necessarily agree that a 'positive' PCR test (it doesn't produce binary results) makes further testing 'necessary'
i think that, if one doesn't typically get tested for influenza, there's little or no point in getting tested for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus - i say this for several reasons, one being that this alleged "novel" virus has not been properly isolated according to at least several scientists and doctors - when you combine that with the deaths alleged to be a result of COVID19 (not "died with"), which do not seem to exceed that of a typical flu season (or not by a lot anyway) once we adjust for what we know to be a massively inflated number, i honestly have to question whether there is a new virus at all - it certainly isn't easy to find in the numbers (deaths after lockdowns began is another matter)
regardless, there are several trivial treatments for combating this, or any virus, my personal favorite being high-dose vitamin C (say around 4 grams / hr. for an adult) supplemented with some zinc and D3 - chlorine dioxide (MMS) is another extremely effective pathogen slayer and it has been used to treat COVID19 (or the flu, whichever you prefer), but holy hell does that stuff taste horrible
Yes, the isolation issue was/is/still is? a big problem that gets swept under the rug, so who knows what's actually in the gene sequence that's being used to test for COVID.
The reason I say it's an indicator is because it's an amplified test, where the sequence isn't just amplified once, but many times over. Each time you do that, it's just like any other amplified system - any noise present (or introduced) gets amplified with the signal you want. By the time you get to the signal level you want, you have all kinds of other information that is unwanted - aka, the noise. That's a problem in any amplified system, including mine of electronics.
If you have a positive PCR test, that means something got amplified that tripped the test. As you said, the sequence isn't well isolated, so the only way to be more sure (ugh) would be to do serum antibody tests. However, if you're not showing any signs, the worth of that is dubious unless you're at-risk anyway.
I do have a problem with everything being COVID, and it's interesting how "influenza" seems to have vanished.
it's an amplified test, where the sequence isn't just amplified once, but many times over. Each time you do that, it's just like any other amplified system ...
that's my understanding too - it seems like if the sample were cycled <=15, pretty much nobody would test positive, but cycling >=35 times and pretty much everyone would test positive ... and apparently there is no standard (even between labs in the same country) and apparently some/many labs are running 35 cycles ... then there's contamination, positive results for ANY corona virus under certain conditions, etc.
... it's interesting how "influenza" seems to have vanished.
yeah, and guess what those deaths will surely be attributed to?
i think many of us alert folks saw the 'new world order' (re-branded as 'the great reset') being implemented, but i don't think many at all, including myself, ever imagined things would, or even could move this fast
it's damn scary and although i see Trump as the lessor evil, he still seems to be very much on board with at least some of the overall agenda
The PCR test, from what I've read about it, can be a very fine line test. So...do you trust it? I don't, if it came back positive for me I'd want a second opinion instead of trusting it outright.
I can't really speak to Trump, he's...interesting. Very, very interesting. We'll see what happens.
(post is archived)