it's an amplified test, where the sequence isn't just amplified once, but many times over. Each time you do that, it's just like any other amplified system ...
that's my understanding too - it seems like if the sample were cycled <=15, pretty much nobody would test positive, but cycling >=35 times and pretty much everyone would test positive ... and apparently there is no standard (even between labs in the same country) and apparently some/many labs are running 35 cycles ... then there's contamination, positive results for ANY corona virus under certain conditions, etc.
... it's interesting how "influenza" seems to have vanished.
yeah, and guess what those deaths will surely be attributed to?
i think many of us alert folks saw the 'new world order' (re-branded as 'the great reset') being implemented, but i don't think many at all, including myself, ever imagined things would, or even could move this fast
it's damn scary and although i see Trump as the lessor evil, he still seems to be very much on board with at least some of the overall agenda
The PCR test, from what I've read about it, can be a very fine line test. So...do you trust it? I don't, if it came back positive for me I'd want a second opinion instead of trusting it outright.
I can't really speak to Trump, he's...interesting. Very, very interesting. We'll see what happens.
"if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%."
(post is archived)