The government is obviously full of nut jobs in high places which need purging
The government is obviously full of nut jobs in high places which need purging
“We Do Not Take an Oath to King or Queen, a Tyrant or Dictator”
I don't know why he should be fired, should he be saying the conrary?
...
If the recount process shows trump is the elected president then trump is the elected president, not a king, not a queen, not a tyrant, not a dictator. And if this needs to go through court to determine the victor then that's where it's going to go
Also, as of now, according to CISA https://poal.co/s/Electoralfraud/216999
>“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=671
>evidence
>n. every type of proof legally presented at trial (allowed by the judge) which is intended to convince the judge and/or jury of alleged facts material to the case. It can include oral testimony of witnesses, including experts on technical matters, documents, public records, objects, photographs and depositions (testimony under oath taken before trial). It also includes so-called "circumstantial evidence" which is intended to create belief by showing surrounding circumstances which logically lead to a conclusion of fact. Comments and arguments by the attorneys, statements by the judge and answers to questions which the judge has ruled objectionable are not evidence. Charts, maps and models which are used to demonstrate or explain matters are not evidence themselves, but testimony based upon such items and marks on such material may be evidence. Evidence must survive objections of opposing attorneys that it is irrelevant, immaterial or violates rules against "hearsay" (statements by a party not in court), and/or other technicalities.
“We Do Not Take an Oath to King or Queen, a Tyrant or Dictator”
I don't know why he should be fired, should he be saying the conrary?
...
If the recount process shows trump is the elected president then trump is the elected president, not a king, not a queen, not a tyrant, not a dictator. And if this needs to go through court to determine the victor then that's where it's going to go
Also, as of now, according to CISA https://poal.co/s/Electoralfraud/216999
>>“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. **There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.**"
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=671
>>evidence
>>n. **every type of proof legally presented at trial (allowed by the judge)** which is intended to convince the judge and/or jury of alleged facts material to the case. It can include oral testimony of witnesses, including experts on technical matters, documents, public records, objects, photographs and depositions (testimony under oath taken before trial). It also includes so-called "circumstantial evidence" which is intended to create belief by showing surrounding circumstances which logically lead to a conclusion of fact. Comments and arguments by the attorneys, statements by the judge and answers to questions which the judge has ruled objectionable are not evidence. Charts, maps and models which are used to demonstrate or explain matters are not evidence themselves, but testimony based upon such items and marks on such material may be evidence. **Evidence must survive objections of opposing attorneys that it is irrelevant, immaterial or violates rules against "hearsay" (statements by a party not in court), and/or other technicalities.**
(post is archived)