We have seen so little innovation cumulatively directed at taking the frictional costs out of the system. The notion that there’s going to be a lot of innovation and experimentation around how those frictional costs can be taken out feels like a very important kind of idea.
So not actually controlling bitcoin, although trying to, as jews do.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ktorpey/2018/02/28/this-is-who-controls-bitcoin/?sh=15fe2ae07bc9
As the article states, the hodlers control bitcoin. Not jews, not China. And, as the article states, the only way to gain control would to be by forking the blockchain, which doesn't offer any control over the original bitcoin.
According to this article, even when pooling with others, Bitmain still has less than 30% of the market. They would need to nearly double their processing power (without losing any from their pool) to "control bitcoin".
I alreadly know that jews are running China. China would have to be controlling bitcoin for jews to control bitcoin.
You clearly don't understand how blockchain works. None of this is any indication that jews control bitcoin.
You're delusional, shitcoins are part of the jew plan, and you fell right into their trap
"Intel inside"
Moron
You're delusional, shitcoins are part of the jew plan, and you fell right into their trap
That's not an argument.
"Intel inside"
Bitcoin is mined using ASICs, not intel chips. Intel has hardly anything to do with the discussion on crypto, beyond the potential insecurity of intel CPUs leaking private keys.
Moron
You're the one who thought that running a mining pool with less than 30% of the processing power somehow equals controlling bitcoin, or that Larry Summers scrambling to jump on board the crypto train was jews controlling bitcoin.
AH ah ah ah
You still don't get it, do you?
You can vote that down too, pissant
(post is archived)