WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

642

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Ok, let me start with the abject failure of the father of the "gender theory"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a New Zealand American psychologist, sexologist and author specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first researchers to publish theories on the influence of societal constructs of "gender" on individual formation of gender identity. Money introduced the terms gender identity, gender role and sexual orientation and popularised the term paraphilia.[1][2]

Recent academic studies have criticized Money's work in many respects, particularly in regard to his involvement with the involuntary sex-reassignment of the child David Reimer,[3] his forcing this child and his brother to simulate sex acts which Money photographed[4] and the adult suicides of both brothers.[4]

...

No big deal uh? You can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs!

https://thenewamerican.com/study-finds-no-scientific-basis-for-transgenderism/

The report was co-authored by former Chief of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University Dr. Paul McHugh and Arizona State University Professor of Statistics and Biostatistics Lawrence Mayer. They concluded that “gender identity” is not separate from biological sex.

“Examining research from the biological, psychological, and social sciences, this report shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence,” the report prefaced.

“The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” stated the researchers.

...

Case closed

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Um you could have just said "no" or "I guess there aren't any peer-reviewed studies that agree with me"

or are you still looking?

[–] 1 pt

Show me a peer reviewed study proving that the 33 genders are real!

https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2020/03/explained-the-33-gender-identities-recognised-by-the-2016-australian-sex-survey/

Pffff lol

[–] 0 pt

Show me a peer reviewed study proving that the 33 genders are real!

I don't believe that's true. But: you might as well say "again I'm a fucking moron who can't address my lack of ability to find any peer-reviewed journals so I'm going to show off my cowardice skills by changing the debate"

[–] 0 pt

in case you're just young/uneducated and don't understand: the "study" you are citing is not from a peer-reviewed journal, it's from The New Atlantis which is a conservative opinion paper. Not a peer-reviewed journal.

[–] 1 pt

> just young/uneducated and don't understand

Projecting much?

Are you old enough to recall what society looked like before the mass immigration and transgender kids era?

I member...

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No I don't remember the time before humans evolved into society

that was like 40,000 years ago?