"legitimizing "forced access" to female bathrooms for biological males"
That's fine.
"Can females at least object to that ideological garbage?"
Gender is ideological, and so are split bathrooms.
"Gender identity has a biological basis"
It's good that you concede that it's a basis. It's actually really important we agree on this. Now keep that thought going--if it is the basis but a basis is only a starting point, then gender identity does not have to stay the same and can end up completely different than the biological origin.
Now add in the non-obvious cases--biological hermaphrodites (both sex organs) and overproducers of hormones who develop the "wrong" way (like a boy growing breasts at puberty or a woman who grows facial hair) and you can start to see how body dysmorphia is a legit disorder with no one-size-fits-all solution.
"free pass for men parading as girls"
literally this still happens (predators sneaking into girl's bathrooms) when it's still biological split bathrooms (probably because they're already planning on breaking a much much worse law)
yet it's so rare (when you exclude instances of protestors deliberately doing it to try to "prove" that it's not a thing) while the flipside is so common--transgender people forced to use bathrooms that don't match the gender that they look like, causing instances of violence--that you're essentially describing pulling the trolly lever to kill thousands on one track to avoid the one or two little girls on the track you were on
"That's fine." ?
Only for mentally ill people!
There's only 2 genders; male and female
The rest is ideological garbage
Show me some peer reviewed studies from the last two decades that agree with you and we're golden
Ok, let me start with the abject failure of the father of the "gender theory"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a New Zealand American psychologist, sexologist and author specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first researchers to publish theories on the influence of societal constructs of "gender" on individual formation of gender identity. Money introduced the terms gender identity, gender role and sexual orientation and popularised the term paraphilia.[1][2]
Recent academic studies have criticized Money's work in many respects, particularly in regard to his involvement with the involuntary sex-reassignment of the child David Reimer,[3] his forcing this child and his brother to simulate sex acts which Money photographed[4] and the adult suicides of both brothers.[4]
...
No big deal uh? You can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs!
https://thenewamerican.com/study-finds-no-scientific-basis-for-transgenderism/
The report was co-authored by former Chief of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University Dr. Paul McHugh and Arizona State University Professor of Statistics and Biostatistics Lawrence Mayer. They concluded that “gender identity” is not separate from biological sex.
“Examining research from the biological, psychological, and social sciences, this report shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence,” the report prefaced.
“The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” stated the researchers.
...
Case closed
(post is archived)