Sources: the article Millicent F. Weaver is facing felony charges because of a dispute with her mother, Felicia McCarron. The indictment, handed down by a Portage County Grand Jury, shows that the altercation happened on April 25, 2020. McCarron’s first name was spelled “Felecia” in the indictment but a search of online records shows she spells her name “Felicia.” According to the criminal complaint, which Heavy obtained from the county prosecutor, McCarron had been living at the Portage County home for about a month at the time of the confrontation. She moved in after the coronavirus pandemic forced her employer in California to shut down. The report states that on April 25, McCarron was texting with a religious leader “about her daughter being mean.” McCarron accused Weaver of calling her names. Deputies said they confirmed McCarron had sent a text message to her Bishop 26 minutes before dialing 911. McCarron told deputies she started recording on her phone because she wanted to document how the family treated her. She claimed her son, Charles, along with Wince and Weaver, tackled her to the ground in order to steal her phone. McCarron ran out of the house and used a neighbor’s phone to call 911. McCarron added that she saw Charles run to the back of the property and she assumed he was hiding her phone. In a separate interview with responding deputies, Weaver denied her mother’s allegations. She claimed McCarron had lost her phone two days earlier and was upset about it. Weaver described her mother as “mentally ill and not reliable.” Weaver claimed her mother had threatened the rest of the family with a knife, put it away, and then ran outside the house yelling about calling the police. Weaver told deputies they had considered calling 911 themselves but ultimately decided against ... Well, idk what happened but it sounds like everybody was drunk and they started throwing the dishes, the dish washer and kitchen's sink at each others ... Also, worth mentioning: Was Millie Weaver’s Grand Jury Indictment Lawful? Fitzpatrick claims that the indictment is void due to the following citations from the Supreme Court. SECTION 2939.02 (LAST SENTENCE): “The judge of the court of common pleas may select any person who satisfies the qualifications of a juror and whose name is not included in the annual jury list to preside as foreperson of the grand jury, in which event the grand jury shall consist of the foreperson so selected and fourteen additional grand jurors selected from the annual jury list.” The above citation comes from THIS. The Ohio practice is identical to the outlawed method of selection used in Tennessee. I’ve been fighting this conflict for a decade. Trust me. Been there, done that, got the tee shirt, sold it in a garage sale. The U.S. Supreme Court rulings on this are found in Rose v. Mitchell (1979) and Hobby v. U.S. (1984).