WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

336

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement

The sovereign citizen movement is a loose grouping of American[Note 1] litigants, commentators, tax protesters, and financial-scheme promoters. Self-described "sovereign citizens" see themselves as answerable only to their particular interpretations of the common law and as not subject to any government statutes or proceedings.[2] In the United States, they do not recognize U.S. currency and maintain that they are "free of any legal constraints".[3][4][5] They especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate.[6] Participants in the movement argue this concept in opposition to the idea of "federal citizens", who, they say, have unknowingly forfeited their rights by accepting some aspect of federal law.[7] The doctrines of the movement resemble those of the freemen on the land movement more commonly found in the Commonwealth, such as Australia and Canada.[8][9][10][11]

Many members of the sovereign citizen movement believe that the United States government is illegitimate.[12] JJ MacNab, who writes for Forbes about anti-government extremism, has described the sovereign-citizen movement as consisting of individuals who believe that the county sheriff is the most powerful law-enforcement officer in the country, with authority superior to that of any federal agent, elected official, or local law-enforcement official.[13] The movement can be traced back to white-extremist groups like Posse Comitatus and the constitutional militia movement.[14] It also includes members of certain self-declared "Moorish" sects.[15]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) classifies some sovereign citizens ("sovereign citizen extremists") as domestic terrorists.[16] In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) estimated that approximately 100,000 Americans were "hard-core sovereign believers", with another 200,000 "just starting out by testing sovereign techniques for resisting everything from speeding tickets to drug charges".[17]

In surveys conducted in 2014 and 2015, representatives of U.S. law enforcement ranked the risk of terrorism from the sovereign-citizen movement higher than the risk from any other group, including Islamic extremists, militias, racists, and neo-Nazis.[18][19] The New South Wales Police Force in Australia has also identified sovereign citizens as a potential terrorist threat.[20]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement The sovereign citizen movement is a loose grouping of American[Note 1] litigants, commentators, tax protesters, and financial-scheme promoters. Self-described "sovereign citizens" see themselves as answerable only to their particular interpretations of the common law and as not subject to any government statutes or proceedings.[2] In the United States, they do not recognize U.S. currency and maintain that they are "free of any legal constraints".[3][4][5] They especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate.[6] Participants in the movement argue this concept in opposition to the idea of "federal citizens", who, they say, have unknowingly forfeited their rights by accepting some aspect of federal law.[7] The doctrines of the movement resemble those of the freemen on the land movement more commonly found in the Commonwealth, such as Australia and Canada.[8][9][10][11] Many members of the sovereign citizen movement believe that the United States government is illegitimate.[12] JJ MacNab, who writes for Forbes about anti-government extremism, has described the sovereign-citizen movement as consisting of individuals who believe that the county sheriff is the most powerful law-enforcement officer in the country, with authority superior to that of any federal agent, elected official, or local law-enforcement official.[13] The movement can be traced back to white-extremist groups like Posse Comitatus and the constitutional militia movement.[14] It also includes members of certain self-declared "Moorish" sects.[15] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) classifies some sovereign citizens ("sovereign citizen extremists") as domestic terrorists.[16] In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) estimated that approximately 100,000 Americans were "hard-core sovereign believers", with another 200,000 "just starting out by testing sovereign techniques for resisting everything from speeding tickets to drug charges".[17] In surveys conducted in 2014 and 2015, representatives of U.S. law enforcement ranked the risk of terrorism from the sovereign-citizen movement higher than the risk from any other group, including Islamic extremists, militias, racists, and neo-Nazis.[18][19] The New South Wales Police Force in Australia has also identified sovereign citizens as a potential terrorist threat.[20]

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

I hope he likes prison food, because that’s all he’s going to eat for the rest of his life (if he doesn’t get the death penalty, not for beheading someone, but to refuse to be part of a society while profiting from it)

Went to a few meetings years ago. Topic was Adverse Possession. Went home, did an AP on the nice house next door. Filed the $35 fee with the county, moved right in and changed the locks. Placed a 'No Trespassing' sign out front and a Castle Doctrine sign in the window. Rented out my mortgaged home and waited for the fireworks. Long story short - hardly a peep. Sheriff was called on me early on, but he stood on the sidewalk, saw the No Trespassing sign, and just looked at me standing in the picture window. He waved as he left. My wife and I lived there for two years, banking all the money from the rental. Finally got to missing living in our own, other house. Just move back when the tenant moved out. Saved away so much that it allowed us to move up here and buy my 5 acre property in the Blue Ridge Mountains for cash. Mo rent, no mortgage.

Am not a supposed Sovereign Citizen, but on a few topics. they know some cool shit. BTW: No laws were violated in my doing this. Adverse Possession is the law in all 50 states.