I haven't read the article but this sounds like really good news. It goes to show that the CEOs are the main ones pushing for the radical propaganda, not most of the employees. Maybe not even the CEOs - it seems like everyone is operating under fear of social repercussions, but once people are allowed to speak their minds freely it differs a lot from the SJW narrative.

It's actually super fucking epic. /We/ managed to get our talking points slapped all over a liberal-media's paper. They didn't just say how "horrible" and "racist" it was, while burying all the specific. They. Actually. Printed. This:

“Blacks kill blacks at 50 times the rate that whites kill blacks. Usually it is the result of gang violence in the inner city. Where is the outcry?” one commenter said, echoing a common anti-BLM talking point deflecting from concerns about state violence against the black community.

“This tragic incident that happened to George Floyd happened exactly the same to Tony Timpa (white man) by Dallas cops in 2016, and no one seemed to care then,” another employee wrote.There were no out cry for justice in his case. Why? Should we not want justice for all?”

This article might inadvertently sway people's opinion in the opposite direction. They post some sweet talking points, but don't say why it's wrong. Just that's super racist for some reason. Hah

Yeah, I think they were very tame and respectful (considering).

The comments were immediately met with outrage from numerous other LinkedIn staffers, who called the comments disturbing and racist.

Seriously? What a bunch of sheltered babies. Up until that point in the article, I didn't see anything "racist" at all. Everything was fair and respectful and courteous.