Again it's still not about your larp nuclear project for your non existing state
>In reality, you can in all likelyhood drink this water without noticing any difference.
Play stupid game win stupid prize
If you're stupid enough to try that without even knowing the toxicity of that water then you're a fool, evidently
If you're stupid enough to try that without even knowing the toxicity of that water then you're a fool, evidently
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water#Toxicity_in_humans
Too lazy to read the links I've posted before? Just shitting around an unsubstantiated opinion, nobody should ever take seriously?
Yeah, human rights were a mistake.
Again, you fail to understand the basic facts exposed in this article
Filtration didn't work and this water was used to cool the fucking fuel cores
Lol, this is getting even more stupid than I suspected:
This identified that the March 2016 holding of tritium on-site was 760 TBq (equivalent to 2.1 g of tritium or 14 mL of tritiated water) in a total of 860,000 m3 of stored water. This report also identified the reducing concentration of tritium in the water extracted from the buildings etc. for storage, seeing a factor of ten decrease over the five years considered (2011–2016), 3.3 MBq/L to 0.3 MBq/L (after correction for the 5% annual decay of tritium).
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#Fukushima_Daiichi
We're talking about a cube of water, with an edge length of less than 100m, which contains less than 2g of radioactive hydrogen. And that's a problem. Dissolving 2g or tritium into the the greatest reserve of uranium on the crust of planet earth, which is the ocean.
Also: 300KBq per liter... For comparison: The potassium in your body alone radiates with something around 4.5 KBq. So dissolving this stuff in 1 m³ of water per liter - which is nothing when compared to the oceans - would make this stuff MUCH less radioactive than you are.
The sheer stupidity...
(post is archived)