You're moving the goalpost and focus of my comment. I never mentioned the subject of the article, I only expressed my concerns about its source. Debating their content only gives credence and further exposure for their agenda.
I'm not moving the goalpost and focus of your comment. I suggested you to post another source if you think that one is inaccurate. That will give people an alternative view on something some think are considered as propaganda.
You'll notice that some links posted here are from known biased sources and most of the time these posts are getting called out. That's how people learn what source should be trusted and what shouldn't.
Your comment calling out RT as propaganda and link to why is informative and welcome. Don't hesitate to call any future posts/sources that you think are spreading fake news/propaganda.
You'll notice that some links posted here are from known biased sources and most of the time these posts are getting called out. That's how people learn what source should be trusted and what shouldn't.
Now you're understanding why I commented. However, I would change "learn" to "can decide for themselves" in the quote.
Thanks for the conversation.
You're welcome!
PS: BBC is also as well known fake news propaganda television network.
(post is archived)