I'm not moving the goalpost and focus of your comment. I suggested you to post another source if you think that one is inaccurate. That will give people an alternative view on something some think are considered as propaganda.
You'll notice that some links posted here are from known biased sources and most of the time these posts are getting called out. That's how people learn what source should be trusted and what shouldn't.
Your comment calling out RT as propaganda and link to why is informative and welcome. Don't hesitate to call any future posts/sources that you think are spreading fake news/propaganda.
You'll notice that some links posted here are from known biased sources and most of the time these posts are getting called out. That's how people learn what source should be trusted and what shouldn't.
Now you're understanding why I commented. However, I would change "learn" to "can decide for themselves" in the quote.
Thanks for the conversation.
You're welcome!
PS: BBC is also as well known fake news propaganda television network.
As you said, the "truth" doesn't seem to be accessible anymore. I think it's by design that media makes it frustrating and strenuous to investigate and search for that "truth".
As for your PS, the link was the first on the list of a Jewgle search (yes Jewgle, that's another biased opinion of mine which only adds to the discussion). I noticed almost all of the responses on the first page of that search (google.com) are from outlets that view RT as a competitor and are sources I wouldn't immediately trust either. As in my analogy of trees and their fruit, I'm afraid the entire orchard is infected.
(post is archived)