That’s why I suggested you to post another source. Nowhere in my answer I mentioned you to debate it.
If you think an article (from any source) in a post is in accurate, feel free to post another source in the comments.
You're moving the goalpost and focus of my comment. I never mentioned the subject of the article, I only expressed my concerns about its source. Debating their content only gives credence and further exposure for their agenda.
I'm not moving the goalpost and focus of your comment. I suggested you to post another source if you think that one is inaccurate. That will give people an alternative view on something some think are considered as propaganda.
You'll notice that some links posted here are from known biased sources and most of the time these posts are getting called out. That's how people learn what source should be trusted and what shouldn't.
Your comment calling out RT as propaganda and link to why is informative and welcome. Don't hesitate to call any future posts/sources that you think are spreading fake news/propaganda.
You'll notice that some links posted here are from known biased sources and most of the time these posts are getting called out. That's how people learn what source should be trusted and what shouldn't.
Now you're understanding why I commented. However, I would change "learn" to "can decide for themselves" in the quote.
Thanks for the conversation.
(post is archived)