RT is a Russian international television network funded by the Russian government.
Why give bandwidth and exposure to the Russian Govt. propaganda outlet?
Why not? We give bandwidth the US propaganda outlet. We give exposure to every propoganda outlet out there which is almost anything anyone writes about anything, I'm not sure anyone could really provide an example of an unbiased source anymore.
Because Poal is not an echo chamber and anyone is free to call out news they deem as fake ones.
RT has been posting more accurate US news than the entire US MSM.
If you believe that article is inaccurate, please feel free to post another source. 😉
RT has been posting more accurate US news than the entire US MSM.
That's an opinion, not a fact. Since they have been required to register in the US as a foreign agent (bbc.com), that exposes their source and intentions, as opposed to CNN, WaPo, NYT. As to a particular article, their intent in each case is to report and spin facts that promote the agenda of Russian Govt. ie: propaganda.
I'm not calling for any censure if someone wants to post an article regardless of source, but I will not be drawn into debating their particulars. You never get apples from an orange tree.
That’s why I suggested you to post another source. Nowhere in my answer I mentioned you to debate it.
If you think an article (from any source) in a post is in accurate, feel free to post another source in the comments.
(post is archived)