to the original CNN article.
Thanks!
to the original CNN article.
Thanks!
Well no shit, that's what Pakistan is for.
If you ever want to tick off a poo in the loo, ask them why they gave up half their country to Muslims to form Pakistan. They'll blame the British, to which you reply, "Look at how you've just avoided all responsibility again, no wonder you couldn't control your country and let it split off".
If you ever want to tick off a poo in the loo, ask them why they gave up half their country to Muslims to form Pakistan.
Pakistan mainly happened because of Gandhi. He supported the creation of Pakistan yet at the same time asked Muslims to NOT move to Pakistan and stay in India during partition. This is why he was assassinated by a Hindu nationalist in 1948.
I knew Ghandi was a cunt that slept with his young cousins to "test his temptation". But I didn't realise he fucked up that bad. Indians - at work at least - seemed to speak highly of the guy too!
Thanks for that tidbit of information.
But I didn't realise he fucked up that bad. Indians - at work at least - seemed to speak highly of the guy too!
Gandhi was controlled opposition along with the likes of Nehru and the Indian National Congress. They fucked India's economy with socialist policies for decades until the late 80s/90s which was when the Indian right wing (BJP & RSS) finally started to become resurgent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose
^ This guy was the true founding father of India.
It would be good if the Jews were also denied nationality but as the Jews also control India, it will not happen
It makes no difference anyway, because India is a feminist shithole.
I'm confident millions of kafirs will rush to the rescue of muslims in 3, 2, 1...
Hm
Well it's coming anytime soon now
...
In the mean time here's your daily cultural break
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kafir#In_proper_sense
In proper sense
When the Islamic empire expanded, the word "kafir" was used broadly for all pagans and anyone who disbelieved in Islam.[53][54] Historically, the attitude toward unbelievers in Islam was determined more by socio-political conditions than by religious doctrine.[14] A tolerance toward unbelievers "impossible to imagine in contemporary Christendom" prevailed even to the time of the Crusades, particularly with respect to the People of the Book.[14] However, animosity was nourished by repeated wars with unbelievers, and warfare between Safavid Persia and Ottoman Turkey brought about application of the term kafir even to Persians in Turkish fatwas.[14] During the era of European colonialism, the political decline of Islam impeded organized state action against the pressure from Western nations, and the resulting feeling of impotence contributed to a rise of hatred against unbelievers and its periodic manifestations, such as massacres.[14]
However, there was extensive religious violence in India between Muslims and non-Muslims during the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal Empire (before the political decline of Islam).[55][56][57] In their memoirs on Muslim invasions, enslavement and plunder of this period, many Muslim historians in South Asia used the term Kafir for Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs and Jains.[53][54] [58][59] Raziuddin Aquil states that "non-Muslims were often condemned as kafirs, in medieval Indian Islamic literature, including court chronicles, Sufi texts and literary compositions" and fatwas were issued that justified persecution of the non-Muslims.[60]
Relations between Jews and Muslims in the Arab world and use of the word "kafir" were equally as complex, and over the last century, issues regarding "kafir" have arisen over the conflict in Israel and Palestine.[61] Calling the Jews of Israel, "the usurping kafir", Yasser Arafat turned on the Muslim resistance and "allegedly set a precedent for preventing Muslims from mobilizing against 'aggressor disbelievers' in other Muslim lands, and enabled 'the cowardly, alien kafir' to achieve new levels of intervention in Muslim affairs."[61]
In 2019, Nahdlatul Ulama, the largest independent Islamic organization in the world based in Indonesia, issued a proclamation urging Muslims to refrain from using the word kafir to refer to non-Muslims, in the interest of promoting religious tolerance and co-existence.[62]
Muhammad's parents
A hadith in which Muhammad states that his father was in hell has become a source of disagreement about the status of Muhammad's parents. Over the centuries, Sunni scholars have dismissed this hadith despite its appearance in the authoritative Sahih Muslim collection. It passed through a single chain of transmission for three generations, so that its authenticity was not considered certain enough to supersede a theological consensus which stated that people who died before a prophetic message reached them—as Muhammad's father had done—could not be held accountable for not embracing it.[63] Shia Muslim scholars likewise consider Muhammad's parents to be in Paradise.[64][65] In contrast, the Salafi[66] website IslamQA.info argues that Islamic tradition teaches that Muhammad's parents were kuffār (disbelievers) who are in Hell.[67]
...
That's right muhammad's parents burn in hell
(post is archived)