Either way, it appears they have a long way left to go before this tech works well. I read it but remember losing interest after listening to their shitty results and I skimmed through the rest. Nothing to fear from this tech, for a while anyway.
maybe the collected the data 10 years ago and they just now got around to using it for this test
That was my take on it.
Either way, it appears they have a long way left to go before this tech works well. I read it but remember losing interest after listening to their shitty results and I skimmed through the rest. Nothing to fear from this tech, for a while anyway.
>maybe the collected the data 10 years ago and they just now got around to using it for this test
That was my take on it.
(post is archived)