WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

Why can't Texas shoot them dead??

Why can't Texas shoot them dead??

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

At least arrest him in aiding and abetting and destruction of government property. Federalism doesn't make them immune from state law.

[–] 3 pts

They can. They didn’t.

[–] 2 pts

Because you better be ready to go 1000%. The jews will send the in the army to execute any and every one involved. Army faggots will oblige anyone paying for their tranny surgeries

[–] 2 pts

At least one pregnant sow ready to drop its anchor.

[–] 1 pt

Don't mess with Texas, unless you're in Border Patrol.

[–] 1 pt

Start popping off homeland border peeps, leave them there. Sorry Biden, no idea what happened. Must be the coyotes.

[–] 1 pt

Probably because the one thing the Constitution does give power to is the federal government over borders. So, technically and legally, the country's borders are the property of the feds.

I am not a legal scholar or expert, so could be wrong.

[–] 1 pt

They should make it a capital crime to interfere with that razor wire.

[–] 1 pt

They are sworn to protect it. Constitutionally the power transfers to militias and anyone opposing it, including the feds or military are traitors. This is what the rule law actually allows.

By failing to uphold their oath and protect the border they have abrogated their authority to We The People and our militias. That's the law. Any judge claiming otherwise is admission to treason (aid and comfort to enemies).

[–] 1 pt

Well thats sort of my point - if the administration has given orders to open the borders, or prevent whatever the states are doing to their borders under the guise of 'interfering with Fed", then I would think it has a legal standing. Again, I don't know and I think the assholes that are opening the border should be considered traitors for sure... So I agree.

[–] 1 pt

Not worth shooting them over. Better for our case to expose them and show restraint.

[–] 0 pt

Not advocating for it, just want to know why Texas authorities are not enforcing the barrier and it's own sovereignty.

[–] 1 pt

That’s why. Usually you want to give good people a chance to be good before you drop the kill hammer because of public perceptions and distortions. They understand the big picture and act accordingly. At the end of the day when you have two groups of people who did bad shit, the people who had more restraint from the onset are remembered more favorably as people have to make decisions about how to feel about something.

[–] 1 pt

Why doesn't England use Sopwith Camels with an interrupting gear on the twin forward mounted .303 Vickers machine guns flying over the white cliffs of Dover shooting every muslim and nigger invader on a rubber raft that's invading their homeland?

Oh...that's right...like the Saturn 5 rocket that launched the Apollo Moon missions, I guess the Brits lost that technology.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I'm puzzled too.

Entering a country illegally is something that makes you a criminal and enemy combatant as an invader instantly. If unarmed, I believe according to the Geneva Convention they are declined entry and left to leave back to their land. If they refuse I think lethal action is legal. It's like if an unarmed person breaks into your home. If you demand they leave and they do, then you can simply report a break and enter, if they refuse to leave, it's a hostage situation and anything goes to eliminate them.

ALL illegals need to be deported or treated like enemy combatants immediately.