WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

613

Isn't it funny how tor onion addresses were supposed to help fight censorship, yet onion addresses are censored in /r/onions because the libtards don't like them?

/r/onions mod DrinkMoreCodeMore bans anyone mentioning onions he doesn't like, including the Daily Stormer onion address and the 8chan address (but doesn't object the redpol bunker chan address). Users are banned instantly for answering a question and get lectured on the evils of racism, which is also strange as DrinkMoreCodeMore hates the Chinese with a passion.

Riseup is actively promoted as an email service, despite not accepting registrations.

He is also active as a mod in a few dozen other subs including a few about New Orleans, where he exhibits the same behavior and even demands that random users give him their e-mail address to verify their identity. Strangely he also claims to be an authority on hacking and privacy issues.

Three users report being instabanned for mentioning the Daily Stormer onion url: https://archive.ph/2wbBJ

A strange living for someone aspiring to educate others in privacy issues: https://archive.ph/h3kOp

Antifas say no to racism but hating the Chinese is perfectly fine: https://archive.ph/y2D3R

Actually this serves as an example how liberals and antifas try to infiltrate every community and then start ostracizing everyone they don't agree with once they secure a position with power. Also how their life doesn't conform with what they preach.

Isn't it funny how tor onion addresses were supposed to help fight censorship, yet onion addresses are censored in /r/onions because the libtards don't like them? /r/onions mod DrinkMoreCodeMore bans anyone mentioning onions he doesn't like, including the Daily Stormer onion address and the 8chan address (but doesn't object the redpol bunker chan address). Users are banned instantly for answering a question and get lectured on the evils of racism, which is also strange as DrinkMoreCodeMore hates the Chinese with a passion. Riseup is actively promoted as an email service, despite not accepting registrations. He is also active as a mod in a few dozen other subs including a few about New Orleans, where he exhibits the same behavior and even demands that random users give him their e-mail address to verify their identity. Strangely he also claims to be an authority on hacking and privacy issues. Three users report being instabanned for mentioning the Daily Stormer onion url: https://archive.ph/2wbBJ A strange living for someone aspiring to educate others in privacy issues: https://archive.ph/h3kOp Antifas say no to racism but hating the Chinese is perfectly fine: https://archive.ph/y2D3R Actually this serves as an example how liberals and antifas try to infiltrate every community and then start ostracizing everyone they don't agree with once they secure a position with power. Also how their life doesn't conform with what they preach.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt 5y

I have rethought his rank. He will be moved from Rank 6 to Rank 4 because I have determined that Rank 4 is more appropriate for him.

[–] 1 pt 5y

Test.

[–] 1 pt 5y

I have added DrinkMoreCodeMore to the leaderboard.

He currently occupies Rank 6.

[–] 1 pt 5y

How many users has DrinkMoreCodeMore unjustly banned already? (approximately)

[–] 1 pt 5y

There must be dozens, taking into account that 3 users were instabanned in a couple of hours for replying with the DS onion url, and this is not limited to /r/onions but also happens in the New Orleans subs where he bans people all the time for their political opinions while advocating for some kind of liberal militarization himself.

[–] 1 pt 5y

Thanks for sharing your experience!

And well done for including archive links!

[–] 1 pt 5y

How would you describe his behaviour summarized? (for the Misconduct column of the table.)

[–] 1 pt 5y

Censorship against the sub's purpose, massbans on political or irrelevant grounds, double standards, entryism and hypocrisy, blackmailing users for personal data while claiming to be a proponent of privacy.