WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

442

archive (archive.ph)

Interesting article popped up in my feed today. After reading the headline, I turned to my wife with grunt and a grin and read her the headline followed with: USVs are nothing new - not a new hypothetical, not a new theoretical, and with these specs consider Nord Stream 2 during a training exercise within prox.

To my chagrin, the last two paragraphs meet that quite well. Nothing like bringing up the very act this tech is intended to 'thwart'. and we all know, if it's being made public, the capability has been deployed for along time.

[archive](https://archive.ph/kvaEn) Interesting article popped up in my feed today. After reading the headline, I turned to my wife with grunt and a grin and read her the headline followed with: USVs are nothing new - not a new hypothetical, not a new theoretical, and with these specs consider Nord Stream 2 during a training exercise within prox. To my chagrin, the last two paragraphs meet that quite well. Nothing like bringing up the very act this tech is intended to 'thwart'. and we all know, if it's being made public, the capability has been deployed for along time.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Like you stated unmanned subs are not new, they've been around for decades for extremely deep dives.