WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Einstein was a plagiarist and a fraud, he stole the world of other physicists without crediting them.

Hawking was replaced at least a decade before his "death" by an actor, the real Hawking died a long time ago. His work was mediocre.

Having a high IQ will only help him if he asks, or is directed towards, the right questions. Most likely he will be steered on to some nonsense like the so called "Climate Emergency".

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Albert Einstein, who, despite the fact that he never formally took the test, is considered to have had the same IQ

Fake ass lying jews as usual.

He could recite the periodic table at six and that makes him a genius. i know four year old that play chess. the question will be, how will they take advantage of this kid's brain to channel whatever intellectual acumen he may possess.

[–] 0 pt

He should look into what it would take to bake 6 million pizzas....

[–] 0 pt

People like that tend to learn quickly and easily, but are unable to use the knowledge because they don't develop a work ethic.

[–] 0 pt

Stephen Hawking, whose IQ was 160, and Albert Einstein, who, despite the fact that he never formally took the test, is considered to have had the same IQ.

Thats some BS

Hell, I'm no genius, and my tested IQ is 151 on the Stanford-Binet, taken in 1986. I think that barely qualifies me for membership in the Triple-Nines, a group of faggots dedicated to making a high IQ seem gay. So 160 just doesn't sound all that fancy to me. I'd still win 3 out of 10 chess matches.