Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

605

I'm really starting to wonder if Voat is now an Alphabet company. It seems that the changes being abrupt and major might be because of a powerful hand from a powerful company is pulling the strings. The angel investor might be an Alphabet big wig instead of the main company to keep it off the radar. Putt did say we piss of some powerful people, but he never said they were government people. Maybe it's not Alphabet but it could be some other tech giant. I think they found Putt's price. Does this seem plausible?

I'm really starting to wonder if Voat is now an Alphabet company. It seems that the changes being abrupt and major might be because of a powerful hand from a powerful company is pulling the strings. The angel investor might be an Alphabet big wig instead of the main company to keep it off the radar. Putt did say we piss of some powerful people, but he never said they were government people. Maybe it's not Alphabet but it could be some other tech giant. I think they found Putt's price. Does this seem plausible?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (44).
[–] • 5 pts

Where do you think the delineation began on his changed diction? I could try and investigate when I get the time, making observations on how Putt's rhetoric transformed based on sentence structure, behavior, and argumentation. It would take awhile to reach anything conclusive, if it all though.

[–] • 5 pts

I first picked up on a change in cadence and rhythm in his "Builders" speech. The writing was not the same with his quirky sentence structure and odd cadence. It had too much flow and some words seemed un-Putt-like. I can't give examples at the moment, but if you can compare it to an earlier post you may find the differences stand out.