WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

The most vigorous defenders of (((Blum))) have only been pedo apologists. Resorting to innovative mental gymnastics trying to justify how that's okay, the admins went completely against their own rules to not only protect and keep child sexualization, but ban the one that called it out as wrong. Twice.

This is almost pizzagate worthy as it makes one wonder what else they're covering up. Note in the image the public outcry to get rid of it, and the apathetic, indifferent response from "system" who is better known as The_Venerable from real Voat. Cynabuns, (nicknamed Cynabans, the co-admin) is complicit in all this and took an active part in silencing critics. The behavioral pattern of "her" is a complete 180 from the person on Voat.co. It lead several to conclude it has to be a shared account, as the pattern keeps changing and is antagonistic to an actual developer.

Inb4 fake voat pedos nil (goes by Try on fake voat, and a slew of other 3 letter alts on old Voat), mikenigger and NicotinicAcid have their REEEEEs that it's taking out of context, lying, "obsessed" or "the real pedo"; they all defended sexualizing kids and all the evidence is in the screen caps so they can't delete it like (((Blum))) did. They all celebrated censorship after accusing Poal of same thing.

See my previous post on it. https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnVoat/423556 It started off as an exposure of Venerable being a lying hypocrite, that suddenly turned into pedophile sympathy. He declared talking about it was "spam" and "spam is against the rules". This after he said "Not becoming Poal is important to me", he instantly did what he accused AOU of doing. (Where have we seen that tactic before?)

(((Blum))) enjoys the "child porn is free speech" tactic to ruin a free speech website by using a 3rd party to place the blame on (Mark Ryden) yet, he is the one posting fixations on child exploitation. His only defense is projection, a "No U" response and "it's legul" which means jewish lawyers dictate his morality. After he caught serious flak for it, he then claimed he "wanted the most downvoted post on .xyz history" as his new cover. Well, it worked. But by that time the cat was out of the bag and content creators started leaving, HDL being one of the first to jump ship. Admin was content with people leaving in droves "because it means less drama and more money for me." He's openly happy to see people leaving in protest.

https://www.voat .xyz/viewpost?postid=6146095536cd0#comment_61463b9e6e7c6

ALS made an alt that exposed what they did

https://www.voat .xyz/viewpost?postid=61305c2709db6#comment_613135ee3b6fa

That alt is now banned too despite not breaking any rules.

https://www.voat .xyz/profile?user=Antipedosociety&view=comments

The admin tells people complaining to "DELETE YOUR FUCKING ACCOUNTS"

https://www.voat .xyz/viewpost?postid=614650d39837c#comment_61465a95d7945

More to come later.

The most vigorous defenders of (((Blum))) have only been pedo apologists. Resorting to innovative mental gymnastics trying to justify how that's okay, the admins went completely against their own rules to not only protect and keep child sexualization, but ban the one that called it out as wrong. Twice. This is almost pizzagate worthy as it makes one wonder what else they're covering up. Note in the image the public outcry to get rid of it, and the apathetic, indifferent response from "system" who is better known as The_Venerable from real Voat. Cynabuns, (nicknamed Cynabans, the co-admin) is complicit in all this and took an active part in silencing critics. The behavioral pattern of "her" is a complete 180 from the person on Voat.co. It lead several to conclude it has to be a shared account, as the pattern keeps changing and is antagonistic to an actual developer. Inb4 fake voat pedos nil (goes by Try on fake voat, and a slew of other 3 letter alts on old Voat), mikenigger and NicotinicAcid have their REEEEEs that it's taking out of context, lying, "obsessed" or "the real pedo"; they all defended sexualizing kids and all the evidence is in the screen caps so they can't delete it like (((Blum))) did. They all celebrated censorship after accusing Poal of same thing. See my previous post on it. https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnVoat/423556 It started off as an exposure of Venerable being a lying hypocrite, that suddenly turned into pedophile sympathy. He declared talking about it was "spam" and "spam is against the rules". This after he said "Not becoming Poal is important to me", he instantly did what he accused AOU of doing. (Where have we seen that tactic before?) (((Blum))) enjoys the "child porn is free speech" tactic to ruin a free speech website by using a 3rd party to place the blame on (Mark Ryden) yet, he is the one posting fixations on child exploitation. His only defense is projection, a "No U" response and "it's legul" which means jewish lawyers dictate his morality. After he caught serious flak for it, he then claimed he "wanted the most downvoted post on .xyz history" as his new cover. Well, it worked. But by that time the cat was out of the bag and content creators started leaving, HDL being one of the first to jump ship. Admin was content with people leaving in droves "because it means less drama and more money for me." He's openly happy to see people leaving in protest. https://www.voat .xyz/viewpost?postid=6146095536cd0#comment_61463b9e6e7c6 ALS made an alt that exposed what they did https://www.voat .xyz/viewpost?postid=61305c2709db6#comment_613135ee3b6fa That alt is now banned too despite not breaking any rules. https://www.voat .xyz/profile?user=Antipedosociety&view=comments The admin tells people complaining to "DELETE YOUR FUCKING ACCOUNTS" https://www.voat .xyz/viewpost?postid=614650d39837c#comment_61465a95d7945 More to come later.

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

I wonder which one of those faggots was trolling with that violent pedo shit towards the end of voat. That shit got me violently angry

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Blumen4alles did.

https://www.voat.xyz/profile?user=blumen4alles&view=submissions

Oh, I just saw you meant old voat. Probably one of his alts, he admits to using many "because of downvote stalkers".

[–] 5 pts

He needs to be [REDACTED]

[–] 4 pts

Agreed. And his protective admins to boot.

[–] 4 pts

I'm fairly certain that's not the real B4A. I remember that dude on old voat and he never posted anything like this. I think it's very likely many old voat user names have been registered by kikes for shit like this.

[–] 2 pts

He had no trouble sourcing his own content from old voat defending his position, it's already been confirmed that it's him. His account bears the "Verified Goat" badge, something which is only obtainable by messaging The_Venerable on SearchVoat Forums to confirm your account is valid, he then issues that badge to the account. SearchVoat will show "Voat Survivors" with a red username, the ones that got their passwords in a PM on old voat would be able to access these accounts. New accounts registered after the fact show up in blue, that's how it is verified.

[–] 1 pt

Often, if you believe you have "downvote stalkers", you might want to take a step back and ask yourself: "Am I just a gigantic fucking asshole that nobody can stand? Maybe I'm the problem...?"

[–] 0 pt

That's funny because he loved using that line against ALS when he was banned for wrongthink.