I never said that.
Predictive models are the best way to determine if something is correct. It's not 100%, but that's how science works. My models are highly predictive. Q is 0% predictive. There have been no arrests of the deep state. And there will not be any because Trump is not a patriot, he's a zionist and a zionist living in israel is a patriot, a zionist anywhere else is a traitor.
You can use models that fail to accurately predict. You can believe that diversity is a strength and that the sun will rise in the south. But don't be surprised when people correct you, suggest ways you can modify your models to be more accurate. And when you reject their suggestions and keep being wrong 100% of the time, don't be surprised when they exile you.
Strawman argument as a rebuttal
This is pointless. Enjoy your delusions.
What are the Q people going to do in a month when Bidet is president?
What are a non-homogeneous group of people you or I know nothing about going to do if a hypothetical thing happens?
You are getting to be a real bore. I am not here to play 20 questions about hypothetical situations. Go White Knight some Qs or something if that is your bag. Or hang yourself. I don't care. Seriously.
(post is archived)