Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

224

Things are a little different here than they are (were) on Voat, but you'll get used to things pretty quickly.
You might want to check out the Welcome page, the Terms of Service, and/or the handy User Guide.

The biggest difference is that @AOU and @PMYB2 are both very active here so things run smoothly.

Things are a little different here than they are (were) on Voat, but you'll get used to things pretty quickly. You might want to check out the [Welcome](https://poal.co/welcome) page, the [Terms of Service](https://poal.co/tos), and/or the handy [User Guide.](https://poal.co/userguide) The biggest difference is that @AOU and @PMYB2 are both very active here so things run smoothly.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (733).
[–] • 0 pt

If I assume a someone who is playing a shell game is being conned, who is the fool? Me or the man who thinks the game might be legit? Me or the man who thinks Penn and Teller might really be a wizards? Me or the man who thinks he'll get rich paying in to a ponzi scheme?

When the Q larp first happened on 4 chan everyone who knows anything about cons and mentalists recognized it as a cold reading/prophet scam. They demanded a specific fact that wasn't public knowledge. This is how you defeat a cold reader.

https://files.catbox.moe/to0odz.jpg

As of Nov 1 2017 Q has been a proven hoax. That's why it's rejected by everyone from 4 chan to /r/conspiracy. Not because you're on to something.

The classic scams have endured through the ages because they abuse powerful mechanisms. Otherwise intelligent people fall for them. Hope, the desire to be in on a secret, reverse logic. You want to believe you figured out the prophecy. I get it, but that doesn't make it any less of a scam.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

If someone else has something wrong, that means what I believe is correct

No. No it doesn't. This is a False Dichotomy Fallacy.

Edit to add: Downvote for literally stating a fact? That is the most faggoty god damned thing I have ever seen. Well, here anyways, on Voat that is standard. Enjoy your karma, loser bitch.

[–] • 0 pt

I never said that.

Predictive models are the best way to determine if something is correct. It's not 100%, but that's how science works. My models are highly predictive. Q is 0% predictive. There have been no arrests of the deep state. And there will not be any because Trump is not a patriot, he's a zionist and a zionist living in israel is a patriot, a zionist anywhere else is a traitor.

You can use models that fail to accurately predict. You can believe that diversity is a strength and that the sun will rise in the south. But don't be surprised when people correct you, suggest ways you can modify your models to be more accurate. And when you reject their suggestions and keep being wrong 100% of the time, don't be surprised when they exile you.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Strawman argument as a rebuttal

This is pointless. Enjoy your delusions.