I see, I apologize if I came of a bit hostile. The strawman here is that you state that he is against "Qanon who wants to stop child trafficking end corruption get Trump back in office". I assume the poster your replied to agrees with your stance on child trafficking, corruption and getting Trump back in office. However, the way you presented it it seems as if he's against Q who is valiantly fighting for these values. From his point of view, I assume he thinks that Q is controlled opposition / a psychological operation by a government agency to keep people complacent (e.g. by trusting the plan), which was the general consensus on Voat regarding Q. I assume he probably thinks Q actually has a negative effect on the aforementioned causes, which is why he dislikes Q and his followers (due to their perceived passivity). For the ad hominem, after some self-reflection I think I was wrong. If he calls Q followers tards then naturally you're free to call him a rabbi. Not really an ad hominem, especially on a forum where people call each other niggerfaggots all the time. I appreciate the fact that you want to debate in good faith, by the way. I hope my reply elucidated my viewpoint on the issue.