I guess the question is.. if you've never see the real deal to know the difference, does it matter that its fake?
Its still lewd content. Though as long as its not being disseminated as real imagery, a person cannot claim defamation.
If someone who were skilled enough to "photoshop" a celebrity's face onto another person's nude body to the point that the manipulation is indistinguishable at a glance (without close/significant inspection).. would that be different from the AI generated image? How realistic does this synthetic pornography have to be for new legislation to be warranted?
I guess the question is.. if you've never see the real deal to know the difference, does it matter that its fake?
Its still lewd content. Though as long as its not being disseminated as real imagery, a person cannot claim defamation.
If someone who were skilled enough to "photoshop" a celebrity's face onto another person's nude body to the point that the manipulation is indistinguishable at a glance (without close/significant inspection).. would that be different from the AI generated image? How realistic does this synthetic pornography have to be for new legislation to be warranted?
(post is archived)