Disagree. Controlled opposition is just that, controlled.
It may be true in some cases that a controlled op asset has some latitude to speak, but not Tucker Carlson. Why? because Carlson is an asset of Fox News, always has been. He doesn't own his show, doesn't own network, doesn't own the producer, doesn't own the cameras, the FCC license, nothing.
He says what he' told to say. This whole incident is a rebrand of Carlson and a means to gain trust with the "conservatives"
They're making you think he's some kind of insider. He's nothing but a pawn.
>Controlled opposition is just that, controlled.
See the goldfish in his bowl? Same deal. You don't control everything he does, his every move. You just let him be in whatever space you allow him to swim. It's much more handy and convincing.
>controlled op asset has some latitude to speak
Well he got exactly that. Spoke against jan6 narrative, spoke against big pharma and the jab, spoke against transfaggotry on kids, for instance
>He doesn't own his show, doesn't own network, doesn't own the producer, doesn't own the cameras, the FCC license, nothing.
Yes, just like the goldfish in his bowl
Fox news is the controlled mainstream opposition channel, "conservatives" channel
It's fox news that prevents one from saying that all mainstream news channels were against trump. Instead, one has to say "almost all" mainstream news channels were against trump...
Zognald... https://archive.is/05TbN#selection-963.280-963.308
(post is archived)