He believes he adds something to the discussion. When in fact, he detracts from discussion. He has nothing to add. No one will miss him. Why would they. He could die tomorrow and nothing would change. He wrote books which frequently contain pedo and child sex and rape. Would the world actually be lessor without his mark upon it? I'd argue the less there is of him in the public sphere the better the entire planet becomes.
He believes he adds something to the discussion. When in fact, he detracts from discussion. He has nothing to add. No one will miss him. Why would they. He could die tomorrow and nothing would change. He wrote books which frequently contain pedo and child sex and rape. Would the world actually be lessor without his mark upon it? I'd argue the less there is of him in the public sphere the better the entire planet becomes.
He wrote novels
It's entertainment, with a limited literary value, I mean it's not like stephen king invented a ground breaking new literary style, it's like comics, you always end up more or less with a guy in spandex doing fancy stuffs, we're not talking about frank herbert
It's scifi easy reading
He wrote novels
It's entertainment, with a limited literary value, I mean it's not like stephen king invented a ground breaking new literary style, it's like comics, you always end up more or less with a guy in spandex doing fancy stuffs, we're not talking about frank herbert
It's scifi easy reading
(post is archived)