who wouldn’t
who wouldn’t
The problem isn't that they saved their kids, it's that they pulled back and protected the shooter afterwards.
The problem isn't that they saved their kids, it's that they pulled back and protected the shooter afterwards.
And they chose not to save their kids by killing the shooter, which in addition to being a fantastic idea is their job.
And they chose not to save their kids by killing the shooter, which in addition to being a fantastic idea is their job.
alternatively, the guy had 30 hostages inside a small building without windows and they were too incompetent or too indecisive to respond appropriately.
alternatively, the guy had 30 hostages inside a small building without windows and they were too incompetent or too indecisive to respond appropriately.
The end result is the same.
The end result is the same.
(post is archived)