> However, it looks like there is resistance and Vanguard, the Prince and their friends seem willing to lose money to hold Twitter, because their other clandestine assets that operate through Twitter Now I see what your point was. I guess I'm dense. Thank you for elaborating on it though. A corp that doesn't make money, doesn't have a plan to make money, but has a huge following and a huge market cap is operating outside the usual (well traditional anyways) parameters of collective investment. I understand pouring it all into growth, like Amazon did for a long time, and postponing your profits. But the endgame for Twitter investors doesn't seem like an eventual 30 or whatever years of stable profits. They're looking to get bought out or playing some other game entirely.