>I made an observation. If you cant use math and common sense to acknowledge that there is more of that picture visible than what they say should be then IDK I made an observation too, with measurements and calculations (which uses math, in case you didn't know that). Why is your observation valid but mine not? There's pretty much what I would expect there to be in that picture. All the smaller buildings are missing. You claim they are there but not in focus, but you should at least see something fuzzy above the waterline if that were the case. You can't see shit except for the skyscrapers. You refuse to acknowledge that despite your source picture (that you posted, not me) showing nothing of what you claim. Be honest in your assertions lest you be no better than those you claim are hiding the "truth".