Maybe dont act like a degenerate whore then [828x674 - 68KB]

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (54).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

(edited )

Integrity is remaining loyal to principles, so if it was never instilled within you as a child, then what? Values are what you reach by pondering & reasoning. If you reach those values superficially, like because of peer pressure, are you going to be more loyal to them than if you came to them through making your own conclusions?

I wouldn't say everyone has the same capacity for reasoning such things, so it's better for most to simply have integrity for their ancestors values and that's at least something.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

While I agree that you have outlined those 2 quite accurately, I still think they're the better methods to guiding yourself through life.

Consequence based guidance is purely a authoritarian perspective. While it definitely has its place in a polite and just society, it is balance of the collective.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

(edited )

authoritarian perspective

My favourite. Hierarchy is legitimate, it's order not chaos, it's best to accept the authority of people who A. genuinely want what is best for you & care about you as a default principle/ stance B. are the most competent/ experienced and genetically suited for the tasks required in those positions (not people who lack practical sense or grounding in reality) C. are open to listening to your perspective and complaints, since they care about you

Jews however A. despise you, they literally want you to suffer and die out B. are competent but not the most competent, they excel through ruthlessly psychopathic, insidious means, and are deranged cultists C. why would they listen? you're just a temporary chattel that is marked for destruction

There's no such thing as having no hierarchy, if you don't prepare for a hierarchy of your own choosing, as a collective, one must naturally surface from the chaos and conflict and it may be one that you would have never voluntarily chosen.

Well, to be honest, it would only be authoritarian if I forced you to do it. God's approach is to let you keep doing the same self-destructive crap over and over until you do what he said is best, I mean as a collective. Wouldn't a nation-state with a monarchy & a priesthood bloodline be "authoritarian"? Yet that is what he said for the Israelites to do.

Labelling certain ways of thinking as innately "authoritarian" came from the Jews, it was part of the denazification processes. They tried to pathologize any kind of thinking that lead to resistance to the Judeo-Freemasonic occupiers. Not only that but Luciferians associate Authoritarianism with "the demiurge," and are libertine/ antinomian, which tends to involve depraved acts, transgressing a lot of boundaries. They see themselves as equal, because they believe they have a soul equal to the divine ("Sophia" &/ or "Supreme Androgyne"), but they see everyone else as "hylics."

it is balance of the collective.

Nah, look around. We may not be in a genuine democracy but I have seen enough from the average man and woman to know that is idealistic nonsense.

>authoritarian perspective My favourite. Hierarchy is legitimate, it's order not chaos, it's best to accept the authority of people who A. genuinely want what is best for you & care about you as a default principle/ stance B. are the most competent/ experienced and genetically suited for the tasks required in those positions (not people who lack practical sense or grounding in reality) C. are open to listening to your perspective and complaints, since they care about you Jews however A. despise you, they literally want you to suffer and die out B. are competent but not the most competent, they excel through ruthlessly psychopathic, insidious means, and are deranged cultists C. why would they listen? you're just a temporary chattel that is marked for destruction There's no such thing as having no hierarchy, if you don't prepare for a hierarchy of your own choosing, as a collective, one must naturally surface from the chaos and conflict and it may be one that you would have never voluntarily chosen. Well, to be honest, it would only be authoritarian if I forced you to do it. God's approach is to let you keep doing the same self-destructive crap over and over until you do what he said is best, I mean as a collective. Wouldn't a nation-state with a monarchy & a priesthood bloodline be "authoritarian"? Yet that is what he said for the Israelites to do. Labelling certain ways of thinking as innately "authoritarian" came from the Jews, it was part of the denazification processes. They tried to pathologize any kind of thinking that lead to resistance to the Judeo-Freemasonic occupiers. Not only that but Luciferians associate Authoritarianism with "the demiurge," and are libertine/ antinomian, which tends to involve depraved acts, transgressing a lot of boundaries. They see themselves as equal, because they believe they have a soul equal to the divine ("Sophia" &/ or "Supreme Androgyne"), but they see everyone else as "hylics." >it is balance of the collective. Nah, look around. We may not be in a genuine democracy but I have seen enough from the average man and woman to know that is idealistic nonsense.

parent
link