I had someone do that to me here. Said he went through 11 pages of my comments and didn't see anything he thought was critical of the jews. Can't even remember who that was, it was someone who was a casualty of the Real Voat shutdown.

Correlation is a valid basis for a hypothesis on causation. If 14% of the population commit 60% of the violent crime it is valid to say that group is the causation of most violent crime.

Anyone that can't even say or write "trump" is not worth interacting with. The emotional immaturity is laughable.

Im going to need a source for that information.

Clearly you are bias against redditors and that the sources you use are bias and as such I will state that they are clearly wrong.

I know this because I happen to be a self-described fact-checker and I am just better at knowing what the truth is when I read it.

How could you possibly be so stupid to not include everything from the beginning. Your bias shows how warped and brainwashed you are.

No will NOT look at that source. It is a RADICAL RIGHT WING rag and cannot be trusted. I know, I told you I was a fact-checker already didn't I?

Stupid drumf supporter you should just kys.

From a statistical science standpoint, correlation doesn’t equal causation. That is true. However, correlation is absolutely probable cause to dig deeper to either validate or invalidate, if possible.

In any case, my main complaint with these types of self-aggrandizing, self-proclaimed intellectuals is that they believe EVERYTHING - including common sense knowledge - “requires a source”.

And then, of course, there’s their idea of a “source” to begin with…which doesn’t ever require any sort of real validity outside of groupthink-enforced, dogmatic belief that if someone with a particular title says something, then it must be true…because apparently according to them, “humans with credentials never lie” unless it’s humans with credentials who say shit that they don’t personally like…when in reality, people lie all the time..and those with credentials are not only not exempt from this, they’re probably more likely do it more often because they can be reasonably assured that dumbfucks like that reddit poster won’t question it at all, but rather lap it up because “muh credentials.”

They claim to be for truth, but they aren’t. They’re for a particular narrative so long is it fits within their preconceived notions and implicit biases, and then labeling it as “truth”, then attacking anyone who doesn’t agree to pretend along with them (faggots and trannies are a case in point)…and they wouldn’t know truth or not to begin with, whatever the case. And that’s because they’re incapable of thinking for themselves to begin with, and incapable of spotting patterns and assigning meaning to them. Or they’re just intellectually lazy as fuck. Either way, asshat retards like that can fuck right off.

That's when you point out their Gish Gallop and walk away.