These people are pitiful.
Statisticians should be ready to discuss correlation vs causation.
These 'tards won't even acknowledge the data or offer alternate causes/conclusions.
Isn't the field of statistics built on the idea that it is accurate and without bias?
These people are pitiful.
Statisticians should be ready to discuss correlation vs causation.
These 'tards won't even acknowledge the data or offer alternate causes/conclusions.
Isn't the field of statistics *built* on the idea that it is accurate and without bias?
(post is archived)